267x Filetype PDF File size 1.69 MB Source: clarivate.com
Highly Cited
Researchers 2021
™
Highly Cited Researchers have
demonstrated significant and broad
influence reflected in their publication
of multiple highly cited papers over the
last decade.
These highly cited papers rank in the
top 1% by citations for a field or fields and
™
publication year in the Web of Science .
Of the world's population of scientists and
social scientists, Highly Cited Researchers
are 1 in 1,000.
The Highly Cited Researchers
list is produced each year by
the Institute for Scientific Overview
™
Information (ISI) at
Clarivate. ISI has pioneered
the organization of the
world's research information The list of Highly Cited Researchers 2021 from
for more than half a century. ™ identifies scientists and social scientists
Clarivate
Today it remains committed who have demonstrated significant and broad
to promoting integrity in influence, reflected in the publication of multiple
research whilst improving the papers frequently cited by their peers during the
retrieval, interpretation and
utility of scientific information. last decade.
It maintains the knowledge
corpus upon which the Web
™
of Science index and related Researchers are selected for their The threshold number of highly cited
information and analytical exceptional influence and performance papers for selection differs by field,
content and services are built. in one or more of 21 fields (those used with Clinical Medicine requiring the
™
It disseminates that knowledge in Essential Science Indicators or ESI) most and Pharmacology/Toxicology
externally through events, or across several fields. the fewest.
conferences and publications
whilst conducting primary 6,602 researchers are named Highly
research to sustain, extend Cited Researchers in 2021 – 3,774 in
and improve the knowledge specific fields and 2,828 for cross-field
base. For more information, performance. This is the fourth year
please visit clarivate.com. that we have identified researchers
with cross-field impact. 6,602
™
The Web of Science
organizes the world's The number of researchers selected Highly Cited
research information to in each field is based on the square Researchers in 2021
enable academia, corporations, root of the population of authors listed
publishers and governments to on the field's highly cited papers.
accelerate the pace of research. The number of those with cross-field
It is powered by the world's influence is determined by finding A second criterion for selection is a
largest publisher-neutral citation those who have influence equivalent citation count to highly cited papers
index and research intelligence to those identified in the 21 fields. that ranks the individual in the top 1%
platform. Learn more. by total citations in an ESI field for the
For the Highly Cited Researchers 2021 period surveyed.
analysis, the papers surveyed were the
most recent papers available to us –
those published and cited during 2010
to 2020 and which at the end of 2020
ranked in the top 1% by citations for
their ESI field and year (the definition
of a highly cited paper).
The Essential Science
™
Indicators database reveals There is no universally
emerging science trends as agreed concept of what
well as influential individuals,
institutions, papers, journals and constitutes extraordinary
countries in a field of research.
With science trend statistics research performance
drawn from more than 12 million
articles from over 12,000 global
journals, Essential Science
Indicators delivers the in-depth
coverage needed to effectively To identify researchers with cross- a list that satisfies all expectations or
analyze and benchmark field impact, highly cited paper and requirements. Moreover, a different
research performance, identify citation counts are normalized through basis or formula for selection would
significant trends, rank top fractional counting according to the generate a different – though
performers, and evaluate thresholds required for each field likely overlapping – list of names.
potential employees and (thus, each Clinical Medicine paper Thus, the absence of a name on
collaborators. Learn more. has a smaller unit fraction, or counts our list cannot be interpreted as
less, than one in Pharmacology/ inferior performance or stature in
Incites Benchmarking and Toxicology). Citation counts are comparison to those selected. To
™
Analytics provides objective treated in a similar manner. If the understand both the meaning and
and reliable indicators needed sum of the fractional publication the inevitable limitations of our
to make confident, data-driven counts and the sum of the fractional analytical approach, a careful reading
decisions – to help research citation counts for a researcher equals of the methodology is required.
organizations understand their 1.0 or more, the individual exhibits
impact and how they compare influence equivalent to a researcher
to peers across a range of multi- selected in one or more ESI-defined
disciplinary fields. It enables fields and is therefore selected
them to quickly gain the as a Highly Cited Researcher for
context needed to accurately exceptional cross-field performance.
evaluate funding outcomes,
assess collaborations, identify There is no universally agreed
subject matter experts, concept of what constitutes
benchmark against peers extraordinary research performance
and more. Learn more. and elite status in the sciences and
social sciences. Consequently, no
quantitative indicators will produce
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.