Authentication
389x Tipe PDF Ukuran file 0.28 MB Source: 2008
Tropical ForesTs and climaTe
Filling the REDD Basket:
Complementary Financing Approaches
he set of policies known as REDD REDD market, or required purchases of REDD-
(Reducing Emissions from Deforestation specific units as in Greenpeace’s TDERM.2
and forest degradation in Developing
countries) offers significant potential for Voluntary. Finally, voluntary funding provided
Treducing global warming emissions, but by countries or individuals is not connected to
financing approaches for REDD have become their cap-and-trade markets. Voluntary contribu-
an issue of active debate. Often the discussion of tions can be made at all levels. Official development
financing approaches is seen as “market versus fund,” assistance (ODA), such as Norway’s $ 2.6 billion
but here we identify and discuss three major cate- commitment announced at Bali, is an example of
gories of potential funding for REDD: direct car- national scale voluntary action. Companies and
bon market, market-linked, and voluntary sources. consumers can also purchase credits that, once
All three sources have their particular advantages, purchased, are no longer used for emissions
and all have a role to play in reducing emissions compliance in carbon markets.
from deforestation.
With many such financing options emerging, The Advantages and Disadvantages
there is a growing consensus on the “Basket of of Each Approach
Approaches” idea,1 which would combine diffe- Direct carbon market credits lower the cost of
rent sources of financing for different aspects of reductions globally, and likely have the largest
REDD in different time periods. Below is a dis- potential to generate funding for REDD—many
cussion of what can go into the “REDD Basket.” tens of billions of U.S. dollars per year. On the
other hand, these REDD offsets purchased from
REDD Financing Approaches developing countries lead to higher levels of emis-
Direct Carbon Market. In direct carbon market sions in industrialized countries. Thus, the net effect
funding, companies in industrialized countries on global emissions is zero, at best. Because of the
purchase REDD credits for use as emissions zero-sum nature of offset credits, it is critical to
allowances in their national cap-and-trade systems. ensure that the REDD credits correspond entirely
Through REDD, they purchase the right to emit to real and verifiable reductions—those that are
more domestically than their caps allow, and in turn fully additional and not reduced by leakage. If
prevent emissions from deforestation in develop- reductions are not real, selling the credits in the
ing countries. Direct carbon market funding has carbon market actually risks a net increase in
included such programs such as the Clean Develop- heat-trapping emissions.
ment Mechanism (CDM) forestry projects, and Market-linked mechanisms could generate
would likely also include national-baseline REDD funding in the range of tens of billions of dollars
credits if they were accepted into the post-2012 annually. Unlike direct carbon market offsets, they
carbon market. are not likely to significantly lower compliance costs
in developed countries. However, the reductions
Market Linked. Market-linked approaches funded are in addition to those made by developed
generate funding by using auction revenues or nations. Therefore, verification problems such as
allocated allowances for REDD from cap-and-trade leakage and additionality do not risk increasing net
systems, or by establishing dual market systems in global emissions. Furthermore, they can finance
which REDD credits are not fungible with indus- REDD-related costs such as capacity building,
trial country allowances. In these systems, funding measuring and monitoring, or stabilization of low
increases as cap-and-trade markets grow but the deforestation rates in areas such the Congo Basin.
REDD credits are not offsets. Examples of market- These qualities can help ensure the success of
linked financing proposals include Germany’s pro- REDD overall.
posed use of auction revenues, the U.S. Lieberman- Voluntary approaches have the least potential
Warner Climate Security Act’s proposed use of for generating substantial and reliable funding. They
allowance allocations, the Center for Clean Air are likely to be limited to hundreds of millions of
Policy’s “Dual Market” proposal for a separate dollars per year, and are subject to the fluctuations
Characteristics of REDD Financing Methods
Direct Carbon Market Market-linked Voluntary
Examples REDD credits sold as offsets Auction revenues, allowance Official development assistance,
to developed-country emitters allocations, dual markets voluntary offset purchases
Potential funding Large Medium Small
(many $10s of billions/year)* ($10s of billions/year) ($100s of millions/year)
Effect on Annex 1 costs Lowered None None
Reliable funding Yes Yes No
Effect on net global emissions Zero Additional reduction Additional reduction
Funding for stabilization No Yes Yes
Funding for capacity building No Yes Yes
Mobilizes voluntary efforts No No Yes
Availability After reductions are made When cap-and-trade starts Immediately
* Boldface indicates particularly desirable properties of each of the three approaches.
All three approaches to REDD have desirable qualities; therefore using all three financing mechanisms provides the greatest benefit.
of government budgets in donating Expected Evolution of Funding Needs
countries. Like market-linked mechanisms,
voluntary approaches are in addition to
those made by developed countries, and Voluntary In the short-run,
offer the flexibility to fund capacity the flexibility of
building, stabilization, and other REDD- voluntary approaches
related activities. They also help mobilize presents the quickest
the willingness of countries, companies, way to build up
and individuals to reduce deforestation, capacity. However,
beyond what they might do for solely Market-Linked during the 2020s
economic reasons. While the level of direct carbon market
available funding does not automatically financing could
grow as cap-and-trade markets expand, become the largest
Direct Carbon Market source of funding
voluntary approaches can provide a fun- for REDD.
ding path for countries that have not yet
implemented carbon market systems. 2010 2020 2030
Matching Financing
Timing to Needs share of financing to both directly reduce or larger amounts of funding for countries
In the short-run, the flexibility of volun- deforestation and help avoid the leakage with varying needs that change as the
tary approaches presents the quickest way and non-additionality. Finally, in the REDD process evolves. All three REDD
to build up capacity. Because deforestation 2020s—with built-up capacity, a broad financing approaches should go in the
reductions take several years to verify, the experience base, and near-global partici- basket, producing a system best able
need for funding to purchase credits in pation—the direct carbon market should to grow and develop as the world’s
initial years is low. Approaching 2020, become the largest source of funding needs change.
more funding will be needed, but risks of for REDD.
leakage, non-additionality, and monitoring REDD financing must address the
errors will constrain how much can come unique objectives of different time periods. 1 Discussed by the Coalition for Rain Forest Nations
directly from the carbon market. During Each method—direct carbon market, and the World Resources Institute, among others.
this time period the market-linked ap- market-linked, and voluntary funding— 2 Tropical Deforestation Emission Reduction
proaches can provide an increasing plays an important role, providing smaller Mechanism
Doug Boucher, Ph.D., (Director, Tropical Forest and Climate Initiative,
Union of Concerned Scientists) prepared this summary with assistance from Diana Movius
and Carolyn Davidson. © August 2008 Union of Concerned Scientists.
Printed on recycled paper with vegetable-based inks
Two Brattle Square, Cambridge, MA 02238-9105. Main Office (617) 547-5552 Washington, DC (202) 223-6133
Available online at www.ucsusa.org/REDD.html.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.