Filetype PDF | Posted on 27 Sep 2022 | 4 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
257x Filetype PDF File size 0.47 MB Source: www.scitepress.org
The Effectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training in Reducing Stress
on Intensive Care Nurses
Aufa Putri Suryanto, Ilham Nur Alfian
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Airlangga
Keywords: Stress Inoculation Training, Coping Skill, Deep Breathing, Cognitive Reframing
Abstract: Nursing is a highly demanding job with many responsibilities. Intensive care nurses have more complex
responsibilities, as they must deliver intensive care for critical patients. This condition puts them at risk of
experiencing high stress. This study aims to measure the effectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training (SIT)
in reducing stress on intensive care nurses. SIT aims to help individuals to develop personal coping
strategies and improve their confidence in facing stressful situations. This is a quasi-experimental study with
an experimental one-group pretest/posttest design on 13 subjects. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) is used in
this study to see the degree of stress experienced by the subjects. The data analyses are Wilcoxon Signed-
Rank Test and effect size by Cohen. The analysis results show that SIT has a medium effect in reducing
stress on intensive care nurses. There is a decrease of stress according to mean scores. This research can be
developed further to design a stress management program for nurses
1 INTRODUCTION their patients. This issue might be associated with
the fact that there are understaffed facilities,
Clinical nurses who work in various healthcare therefore giving the nurses less time to care for each
facilities play a major part in the healthcare system. patients. This might also happen due to managerial
Nurses have the responsibility to manage a patient’s or legal issues (Corley, et al., 2005).
healthcare regimens. In many types of research, Aside from their professional issues, nurses can
nursing is said to be a highly demanding job, also experience stress from daily and personal
especially in the last 25 years (Hersch, et al., 2016). problems. They might have interpersonal issues with
Nurses have long working hours. They also work their colleagues or family. They might also
in shifts. This issue can be stressful for nurses, experience role conflict, in which their professional
especially in understaffed facilities (Edwards et al., roles conflict with their personal roles at home.
2000; Corley et al., 2005). This issue also makes These issues can also be stressful for nurses
nurses deal with many patients directly. This means (Edwards et al., 2000; Khamisa et al., 2017).
they also deal with unpleasant patients and it can be Intensive care nurses are slightly different from
a stressful experience for them (Edwards, et al., general nurses as they have more complex
2000). responsibilities. They are responsible for delivering
On the other hand, there are times when nurses intensive care for critical or terminal patients. This
experience a close emotional relationship with their issue might increase the tendency of intensive care
patients. This kind of relationship can be burdening nurses to experience more stress (Kristanto, et al.,
2009).
for them when the patient’s condition worsens or It can be concluded that nurses are at risk of
when they pass away. Nurses must communicate experiencing high stress. Stress itself is experienced
this news to their family, which can also be a by individuals by appraising situations around them.
stressful experience (Corley et al., 2005; Rai & They will feel stressed when they perceive the
Tauheed, 2013; Hersch et al., 2016). situation as threatening or more than what they can
Nurses might experience moral distress in handle (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).
several situations. They feel strained psychologically Stress that is not well-managed can have
when they are unable to deliver optimal service to
negative consequences in nurses’ lives.
168
Suryanto, A. and Alfian, I.
TheEffectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training in Reducing Stress on Intensive Care Nurses.
DOI: 10.5220/0008586801680173
In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings (ICP-HESOS 2018) - Improving Mental Health and Harmony in
Global Community, pages 168-173
ISBN: 978-989-758-435-0
c
Copyright
2020 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
TheEffectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training in Reducing Stress on Intensive Care Nurses
Professionally, stress might reduce their SIT is capable of reducing stress through the change
productivity. It might reduce the quality of patients’ in the clients’ cognition. When the clients undergo a
care. There might also be impaired achievements in cognitive change, their perspective towards
nurses’ work performance (Fernández-Castro, et al., situations also changes. This results in new emotions
2017). and evaluations towards their environment. They
Prolonged stress is associated with burnout in will also develop new coping strategies that are
nurses. Burnout may reduce work satisfaction and more effective and adaptive (Meichenbaum, 2007).
commitment. Nurses who experience burnout are How SIT works to reduce stress in a workplace
more likely to feel emotional exhaustion. This might setting was compared to Acceptance and
put patients in danger due to lack of attention to Commitment Therapy (ACT) by Flaxman and Bond
work safety. Nurses might also experience (2010). Both interventions are cognitive-behavioral-
depersonalization and difficulty in engaging with based. It is said that both interventions are effective,
patients. Other issues associated with stress are but there are some differences in how they work.
declining health, physical exhaustion, absenteeism, ACT works by increasing psychological flexibility
reactivity, and negative attitudes (Fernández-Castro, in the subjects. ACT changes the meaning system of
et al., 2017). an event. On the other hand, they were unable to
In dealing with stress, nurses need a well- establish how SIT essentially works in reducing
planned strategy. This can be achieved with a good stress.
stress management strategy. Researches show that In theory, SIT is supposed to change the clients’
individual stress management interventions with a cognitive processing. However, in the study, it is
cognitive-behavioral perspective are effective in said that the change does not have a significant
increasing the quality of life in the workplace, effect on the reduction of stress. This might happen
increasing psychological resources and reducing due to the limited duration of the intervention, which
complaints related to stress (Klink et al., 2001; was done in 2 sessions for 6 hours. In spite of this, it
Flaxman & Bond, 2010). is said that SIT might help clients to distance
Cognitive-behavioral-based stress management themselves from their negative thoughts, thus
intervention may reduce the level of cortisol that improving their mental health (Flaxman & Bond,
occurs in stressful situations. The decrease in this 2010).
endocrinal response is due to change of cognitive According to these earlier researches, this study
appraisal (Gaab, et al., 2003). This change in aims to measure the effectiveness of SIT in reducing
cognition is also an effective emotional coping stress on intensive care nurses. SIT is still
method (Kawaharada, et al., 2009). Other inconclusive in reducing stress according to
physiological responses may also be altered through Flaxman and Bond (2010), but it is said that this
skills that can possibly be taught in the intervention. might be a technical issue due to the duration of
For instance, deep breathing as a relaxation method sessions. Consequently, SIT in this study will be
can inhibit and hyperpolarize the nervous system. underteken for a longer duration in hope of more
This can give a relaxed sensation to clients (Jerath, effective and significant change in the subjects. This
et al., 2006). study hypothesizes that SIT is effective in reducing
Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) is one kind of stress on intensive care nurses. It is expected that
individual stress management intervention. SIT is a this study can help further development of stress
behavioral-cognitive-based training targeted to management interventions, particularly for intensive
manage stress. It is designed to make clients care nurses.
experience minor stress during treatment, thus
preparing them psychologically to deal with stress in
real life. It aims to help clients develop their own 2 METHODS
personal coping strategies that lead to more
resilience and confidence in facing stressful events This study is a quasi-experimental research with a
(Meichenbaum, 2007). one-group pretest-posttest design. It aims to measure
SIT is based on the transactional stress model by the effectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training
Lazarus and Folkman (1984). This model refers to (SIT) in reducing stress on intensive care nurses.
stress as an overload burden from the environment,
as perceived by the individual. It focuses on the
important role of cognitive-affective processing in
the individual and their coping strategies. Hence,
169
ICP-HESOS2018-International Conference on Psychology in Health, Educational, Social, and Organizational Settings
2.1 Ethical Consideration The scale itself was translated and tested in a study
in Surabaya, Indonesia, by Arbi (2017, r = .846). It
This study has been approved by the ethical has 10 items with Likert scale (0 = never, 1 = almost
committee of the hospital where the study was never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = very often).
conducted. It went through ethical assessment by the The SIT module for nurses in this study is
committee, in which the research proposal and the adapted from Stress Inoculation Training for Single
training module were examined. All participants Mothers in College by Spencer (2010). The original
were given informed consent and information about module has 8 sessions over 8 weeks, one session for
the training accordingly. each week. The module for this study has been
modified to cater to participants’ needs and
2.2 Participants availability.
The supervisor requested all intensive care nurses 2.6 Procedure
who work solely in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU),
without managerial duties, to attend this training. In Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) in this study was
the end, this study was conducted on 13 intensive conducted in 6 sessions. The first session was done
care nurses who work at a hospital in Surabaya. The to build a good therapeutic alliance between
group consisted of 3 male and 10 female nurses. participants and the trainer. The participants’ stress
They have been working in the ICU within the time level was also measured by PSS-10 as a pretest.
range of 2 months – 5 years. The participants had a discussion session in the
The nurses were assigned in 3 different groups next one. They were to discuss their own stressful
randomly for the intervention. This was due to their situations and coping methods with each other. They
different working shifts. The first group consisted of also learned more about stress itself and SIT as an
6 people, the second consisted of 4 people, and the intervention. This session also served as a baseline
third consisted of 3 people. The group remained the for the participants so that they might have the same
same until the end of treatment. Despite these small starting point.
groups, the unit analysis in this study is the whole The next two sessions were skill training
group of 13 nurses. sessions. Participants were introduced to deep
breathing and cognitive reframing as adaptive
2.3 Research Variables coping strategies that they may try to use in the
future. They were also trained to do them.
This study aims to measure the effectiveness of the In the fifth session, participants were asked to
independent variable (X) toward the dependent apply the strategies that they developed before in
variable (Y). The independent variable in this study minor stressful situations. They were asked to
is SIT as an intervention. The dependent variable in imagine a stressful situation and how to deal with it
this study is the stress of the nurses. using imagery rehearsal. They were also asked to list
possible actions and strategies to use in stressful
2.4 Data Analysis situations using behavioral rehearsal.
The last session served as a relapse prevention
Data analyses used in this study are Wilcoxon session. The participants discussed stressful events
Signed-Rank Test and effect size by Cohen. The that might happen in the future and what to do about
data on participants’ stress level from both pretest them. Participants were then evaluated by discussing
and posttest are analyzed descriptively. The data are changes they felt after attending this training. Their
compared statistically afterward, examining the stress level was also measured using PSS-10 as a
significance. This analysis is followed by effect size posttest.
calculation using the effect size equation.
2.5 Material 3 RESULTS
The materials used in this study are the Perceived The results show there is a decrease in stress on
Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10) by Cohen (1994) and participants according to mean scores. Despite the
Stress Inoculation Training for Intensive Care difference, the value is not statistically significant.
Nurses module. PSS-10 was used to measure Below are results of statistical analyses of the data:
participants’ level of stress before and after training.
170
TheEffectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training in Reducing Stress on Intensive Care Nurses
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics. time to actually practice what they trained before
N Mean SD Min Max getting better at managing their stress (Arbi, 2017).
Pretest 13 15.69 5.313 8 27 SIT in this study was conducted in 6 sessions
Posttest 13 13.77 3.516 9 20 within 3 meetings. Each meeting had the duration of
60 – 90 minutes. This can also be an explanation for
Table 2: Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. the insignificance of the training. A SIT training that
is too short might be too simple to modify deep
N Mean Sum of cognitive contents (Flaxman & Bond, 2010).
Rank Ranks SIT is based on a transactional stress model. This
Posttest Negative 6 6.33 38.00 means that stress might come from the individual’s
- Pretest Ranks environment (Meichenbaum, 2007). In this study,
Positive 4 4.25 17.00 there was no treatment applied to the participants’
Ranks environments.
Ties 3 SIT in this study was conducted in a group
Total 13 setting. The participation of the subjects was due to
the order of their superiority. This can make the
Table 3: Significance of Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test (α = participants less motivated to engage in this training
.05). (Yalom, 1995, cited in Corey, 2004). It can also
Posttest – Pretest create resistance among the participants and this can
Z -1.072 make the intervention less effective.
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .284 Despite the insignificance, SIT still has some
effects on the participants. There are 6 subjects who
The data were also analyzed further to see the experienced a decrease in stress. This is because of
effect size. According to the equation, there is a behavioral change due to cognitive-behavioral-based
interventions, including SIT. This change appears
medium effect of the treatment. Below is the because of the interaction between inner speech,
equation for effect size in this study: cognitive structure, and behavior with its own
consequences (Meichenbaum, 1997, cited in Corey,
= (1) 2013).
√ In this training, participants went through the
first phase of this interaction, which is self-
= 1.072 observation (Meichenbaum, 1997, cited in Corey,
13 (2) 2013). This was done by self-monitoring and group
√
discussion about stressful situations. Most
= 0.297 ≈ 0.3 (3) participants were able to be more aware of their
stress in the first meeting. This led to more
According to the statistical analyses, it can be motivation to develop more adaptive behavior. As
concluded that the research hypothesis is rejected. the intervention went, the participants also
SIT is not significantly effective in reducing stress developed a new cognitive structure that allowed
on intensive care nurses. them to have new perspectives.
The second phase of this interaction is the
creation of new internal dialogue (Meichenbaum,
4 DISCUSSION 1997, cited in Corey, 2013). Participants went
through this phase when they realized that their
According to the statistical analyses, the training is previous behaviors were not adaptive. They then
not significant in reducing stress on the participants. tried to find alternative behaviors that are more
One possible explanation for the insignificance is the acceptable. Participants were given new information
number of sessions and duration of the training. It is about stress and this helped them to be more aware
said that SIT needs 3 – 12 months to be evaluated of their behaviors.
thoroughly, while the training and evaluation in this The third phase of this interaction is the learning
study were conducted within 1 month of new skills (Meichenbaum, 1997, cited in Corey,
(Meichenbaum, 2007). This is because in theory, 2013). Participants in this study learned about new
SIT should have booster and follow-up sessions coping strategies, such as deep breathing and
during the timespan. Participants also need more cognitive reframing. These new strategies are more
171
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
