284x Filetype PDF File size 0.23 MB Source: antoniozadra.com
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1 Imagery Rehearsal
2
3 Therapy: Principles
4
5 andPractice
6
½Q2 a, b
½Q3 Barry Krakow, MD *, Antonio Zadra, PhD
½Q4 KEYWORDS
7 Dreaming Dream frequency Dream content
8 Nightmares Trauma Posttraumatic dreams 49
9
10 50
11 51
12 52
13 Manyclinicians in sleep medicine, psychiatry, and frequency, including maintenance of changes at 53
PROOF
psychology remain unaware of the suffering and long-term follow-up.6–9 IRT effectively relieves
14 54
15 distress caused by chronic nightmares. This lack idiopathic, recurrent, and PTSD-related forms of 55
of awareness extends to the therapeutic tools that nightmares.6,8,10,11 In these same studies, a rela- 56
16 effectively reduce or eliminate the problem. Many tively consistent pattern emerged of decreased
17 57
18 nonpharmacologic techniques have been psychiatric distress including anxiety, depression, 58
19 proposed to treat posttraumatic stress disorder or PTSD symptoms, following successful night- 59
20 (PTSD)–related or idiopathic nightmares, including mare treatment. Of the several hundred partici- 60
21 hypnosis, lucid dreaming, eye movement desensi- pants and patients, with and without PTSD, 61
22 tization and reprocessing, desensitization, and treated in research protocols with IRT, approxi- 62
23 imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT). However, only mately 70% reported clinically meaningful 63
24 desensitization and IRT have been the objects of improvements in nightmare frequency. However, 64
25 controlled studies, and IRT has received the most anecdotal observations among those individuals 65
26 empiricalsupport.Thisarticlehighlightskeyprinci- who reported regular use of the technique for 2 66
27 ples behind this technique and the practice to 4 weeks indicate that significant clinical change 67
28 methodsusedtoapplyitbypresentinganabridged occurred in greater than 90% of patients. 68
1 12–17
29 and updated version of an earlier work. Further Variations exist in the application of IRT and 69
30 resources are also available to readers interested IRT has also been adapted for use in children 70
2,3 18,19
31 in additional material on the clinical use of IRT. suffering from nighttimes. The distinguishing 71
32 ForthosepatientsinwhomIRTmaybeimpractical features between these variations generally revolve 72
33 or counterproductive, pharmacotherapy (eg, pra- around the degree of exposure used during treat- 73
34 zosin, a central a-1 adrenoreceptor blocker) may ment sessions and/or the specific application of 74
35 be a useful alternative therapeutic option for the technique during the sessions. This article 75
PTSD-related nightmares.4,5 Readers interested focusesonIRTasdevelopedbyKellner,Neidhardt, 76
36 in pharmacologic approaches to nightmare treat- Krakow, and Hollifield at the University of New
37 77
38 ment and the issue of drug-induced nightmares MexicoSchoolofMedicine(1988–1999)andatthe 78
39 are referred to the article by Pagel in this issue. Sleep&HumanHealthInstitute(2000topresent). 79
40 80
41 CONTROLLED TREATMENT STUDIES THERAPEUTIC COMPONENTS OF IRT
UNCORRECTED
42 In the last 20 years, IRT has been tested repeat- Current Practice
43 edly in various samples and has shown efficacy IRT can be conceptualized as a 2-component
44 in reducing nightmare distress and nightmare therapeutic process, each of which targets
45
46 a Maimonides Sleep Arts & Sciences, Ltd., Maimonides International Nightmare Treatment, Sleep & Human
Health Institute, 6739 Academy NE, Suite 380, Albuquerque, NM 87109, USA
b ´ ´
Department of Psychology, Universite de Montreal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
½Q5 H3C 3J7
47 * Corresponding author.
48 E-mail address: bkrakow@sleeptreatment.com (B. Krakow). theclinics.com
Sleep Med Clin - (2010) -–-
doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2010.01.004 sleep.
1556-407X/10/$ – see front matter ª 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm
ARTICLE IN PRESS
2 Krakow&Zadra
81 adistinctyetoverlappingprobleminthenightmare Box 1 138
82 sufferer. The first component is an educational/ Overview of the main components in each 139
83 cognitive restructuring element, focused on 140
of the 4 IRTsessions ½Q8
84 helping the nightmare sufferer to consider their 141
85 disturbing dreams as a learned sleep disorder, Session 1 142
86 similar to psychophysiologic insomnia. The Reiterating that the group will not discuss 143
87 second component is an imagery education/ past traumatic events or traumatic content 144
88 training element, which teaches patients who of nightmares 145
89 have nightmares about the nature of human Addressing treatment credibility 146
90 imagery and how to implement a specific set of Hownightmares can lead to insomnia 147
91 imagery steps to decrease nightmares. IRT can Hownightmarespassfromanacutephaseto 148
92 bedeliveredindividually or in groups, but for either a chronic disorder 149
93 scenario the same progression of treatment steps Unsuspectedbenefitsfromhavingnightmares 150
94 is offered. Follow-up time is always recommended Session 2 151
95 to reassess the patient. Why nightmares might persist long after 152
96 Thefirst2sessionsencouragepatientstorecog- traumatic exposure 153
97 nize the effect of nightmares on their sleep by What happens to symptoms of low well- 154
98 showing them how nightmares promote learned being when nightmares are treated directly 155
99 insomnia.Theyareofferedtheviewthatnightmares Concept of symptom substitution 156
PROOF
100 themselves may develop as a learned behavior. proportion of nightmares caused by trauma 157
101 Thefinal 2 sessions engage the nightmare sufferer versus conditioning 158
102 to learn about the human imagery system, to Principles of general imagery and pleasant 159
103 monitor how this system operates, to appreciate imagery 160
104 the connections between daytime imagery and Overcoming difficulties in the use imagery 161
105 dreams, and to implement the specific steps of Session 3 162
106 IRT (ie, selecting a nightmare, changing the night- Broader discussion of imagery 163
107 mare into a new dream, and rehearsing the new Imagery as a vehicle for change 164
108 dream). Aspects of each of these 2 components Changing one’s nightmare identity 165
109 are included in all 4 sessions, but learned sleep Session 4 166
110 disorders predominates in the first 2 sessions and IRT for nightmares 167
111 imagery work predominates in the last 2 sessions. Selecting a nightmare 168
112 Anoverview of the main points covered in each of Changing the nightmare any way you wish 169
113 these sessions is presented in Box 1. Rehearsing the new dream 170
114 Throughout the sessions, we never discount or 171
115 ignore patients’ perspectives on triggering inci- 172
116 dents perceived as the cause of their nightmares. 173
117 Thispointisespeciallyrelevantfortraumasurvivors their nightmares with insomnia. Third, most 174
118 with nightmares and for the meanings they asso- patients resonate with the suffering caused by 175
119 ciate with their disturbing dreams. Nevertheless, poor sleep, which validates their negative sleep 176
120 patients are shown how nightmares can be effec- experiences and thus their reasons for seeking 177
121 tively treated without any discussion or emphasis treatment of these vexing sleep disturbances. 178
122 onprevioustraumaticeventsornon–sleep-related The current version of IRT focuses on the 179
123 PTSD symptoms. IRT is organized to minimize broader concept of poor sleep quality, including 180
124 exposuretherapyasaningredientofthetechnique. a discussion of insomnia. This also sets the stage 181
125 for future discussions about sleep-disordered 182
126 SESSION 1 breathing, which the authors have found in a high 183
127 Something to Sleep On rate of trauma survivors with nightmares and 184
21–25
128 UNCORRECTED 185
PTSD. The basic elements of the discussion
129 In our largest randomized controlled trial with revolve around the following points: (1) nightmares 186
130 PTSDpatients,20weintroducedIRTbydiscussing fragment sleep; (2) sleep fragmentation causes 187
131 hownightmarespromoteinsomnia.Thisapproach poor sleep quality; (3) poor sleep quality is 188
132 serves 3 purposes. First, it immediately shows the a psychological and physiologic process; (4) 189
133 patient that our interests are truly focused on efforts to improve sleep quality provide maximum 190
134 sleep-relatedproblemsandnotontrauma,current relief of sleep problems; and (5) treating night- 191
135 negative life events, or PTSD. Second, it creates mares is an important step and sometimes the 192
136 an insightful ‘‘mini-aha’’ experience because best first step in treating posttraumatic sleep 193
137 most trauma survivors do not generally associate disturbance. 194
CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm
ARTICLE IN PRESS
½Q1 Imagery Rehearsal Therapy: Principles and Practice 3
195 Nightmare Help and Harm dreamshavepersistedforsolong.Tosimplystate 252
196 Nightmares not only cause reexperiencing, but that nightmares are a learned behavior is an 253
197 they also initiate a cascading sequence of mental intriguing and provocative statement that may be 254
198 and physical hyperarousal symptoms, triggered met by a full range of emotions and responses. 255
199 bythethreats within the disturbing dreams. These This claim must be backed up with sufficient 256
200 arousal symptoms represent a second symptom examples to persuade the patient to stay in treat- 257
201 cluster in PTSD.26 Following arousal, patients ment. When queried beyond the explanations of 258
202 usually search for ways of preventing this cycle uncontrollability or unconscious processes, some 259
203 from recurring, and quite naturally they seek to patients suggest that nightmares persist because 260
204 avoid the trigger. In this specific sleep-related they are a long-term consequence of trauma (ie, 261
205 instance, trauma survivors report avoiding sleep the trauma is still causing nightmares). Others 262
206 onset at bedtime or re-onset in the middle of the believe that the persistence of nightmares is 263
207 night with the hope of preventing more bad caused by malfunctioning or altered neurotrans- 264
208 dreams. Although patients may not recognize mitters or a genetic predisposition. Occasionally, 265
209 sleep avoidance as a conscious process, most a patient initiating treatment will raise the possi- 266
210 nightmare sufferers resonate with the schema bility that nightmares are a habit or a learned 267
211 once they hear this sequence, which again coin- behavior (some even speak the phrase ‘‘broken 268
212 cides with a third symptom cluster of PTSD record’’). 269
213 However,mostpatientsarelockedintotheidea 270
214 (avoidance). PROOF 271
The discussion turns to the transition process that nightmares persist because trauma or other
215 through which nightmares move from an acute PTSDsymptomsstickintheirminds.Thisrelation- 272
216 phase to a chronic disorder. We use a paradigm, ship is therefore examined in a few ways in an 273
217 developed by Michael Hollifield, which helps attempt to produce cognitive restructuring. First, 274
218 patients recognize that soon after the trauma, we discuss how nightmares might ‘‘take on a life 275
219 they made a natural and smart choice to experi- of their own.’’ Most patients relate to this idea, 276
220 ence nightmares. That is, disturbing dreams, by becausetheyareunsurewhatprovokesadisturb- 277
221 many accounts from the empirical and theoretic ing dream on a specific night-to-night basis. We 278
222 literature, may serve a function of emotional ask whether it seems possible that some type of 279
223 adaptation to emotionally salient or traumatic psychotherapy could be directly targeted at the 280
224 events.27–30 Early after the trauma, nightmares nightmares. Could the disturbing dreams now be 281
225 might help to relive the experience and remember functioning in some distinct manner, separate 282
226 important details that might be meaningful to the from the PTSD process? 283
227 survivor; the dreams might provide useful infor- Wethenworkthroughaparadigmbasedonthe 284
228 mation for emotional processing, either spontane- question: ‘‘If you eliminated your disturbing 285
229 ously through dreaming, rapid eye movement dreams without influencing or treating any other 286
230 sleep, or in collaboration with a therapist; and aspect of your mental health, what would happen 287
231 the nightmares might serve a survival function to these 4 distress symptoms: anxiety, depres- 288
232 by motivating the individual to alter a behavior sion, somatization, and hostility?’’ Most patients 289
233 or some other aspect of their lifestyle to remain declare these symptoms should get worse, 290
234 out of harm’s way. This process leads to the because nightmares must have been serving 291
235 closing question, ‘‘Do these nightmares and dis- a purpose. The term ‘‘symptom substitution’’ is 292
236 turbing dreams still provide any benefits, once used regarding this potential downside of treating 293
237 they have lasted for so long?’’ We suggest that nightmares directly. 294
238 individuals reflect on this question for the next Weorganizethediscussion of this process with 295
239 week, but most people are quick to respond in the example of aggressive and violent nightmares 296
240 the negative. This hopefully provides them with andaskpatients to suggest the types of emotions 297
241 a hint at the possibility that nightmares can take experienced during such dreams. Most suggest 298
242 UNCORRECTED 299
on a life of their own, which is the major focus anger and rage, and a few mention fear, guilt,
243 of the next session. horror, or grief. We focus on anger and rage, and 300
244 then ask what would happen to these feelings if 301
245 a person were suddenly to stop having these 302
246 SESSION 2 nightmares. Again, patients usually state that 303
247 Persistence of Nightmares because the anger and rage have not been 304
248 released through the nightmare experience, these 305
249 Patients who have nightmares usually believe bad emotionsmustgosomewhereelse,whichleadsto 306
250 dreams are uncontrollable and from the uncon- further problems (eg, symptom substitution). 307
251 scious mind; yet, most want to know why the When they are again asked what would happen 308
CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm
ARTICLE IN PRESS
4 Krakow&Zadra
309 to symptomsofanxiety,depression,somatization, self-explanatory elements that are discussed 366
310 and hostility following direct treatment of disturb- include (1) imagery is a natural part of mental 367
311 ing dreams, most patients again report that these activity, which is easily described in behavioral 368
312 symptoms would either worsen or remain terms as 1 component of the mental system of 369
313 unchanged. thoughts,feelings,andimages;(2)imageryisoften 370
314 the last conscious activity just before sleep onset; 371
315 Learning to Have Nightmares (3) ergo, imageryduringthedaymaybeabridgeto 372
316 This phase marks a critical turning point, because imagery at night (dreams); (4) imagery is not medi- 373
317 we briefly but clearly describe the results from tation but simply a daydream with bit more inten- 374
318 nightmare treatment research in which anxiety tion or structure as needed or desired; (5) 375
319 and other distress symptoms usually decrease imagery skills can be tested in brief exercises of 376
320 after nightmares have been treated. Most patients a few minutes, and most trauma survivors have 377
321 sit back to regroup, because these results do not a reasonable ability to conduct such tests in 378
322 resonate with what they learned or believed about groups or individually; (6) some trauma survivors 379
323 nightmares.Althoughmanypatientswillnotfullyor are surprised at their healthy capacity to image 380
324 immediatelyprocesstheramificationsofthisinfor- things; and (7) most PTSD patients, except those 381
325 mation, most participants become curious and of extremeseverity, canpracticepleasantimagery 382
326 excited about this new perspective. exercises at home without much difficulty. 383
327 Special attention is needed during this part of 384
328 In the final phase of this discussion, the patient PROOF 385
is offered an opportunity to estimate the extent the session for the minority of patients with clear-
329 to which disturbing dreams can be attributed to cut imagery deficiencies. They may report either 386
330 trauma (0%–100%) or to habit (0%–100%) with outright difficulty as a black or blank screen, or 387
331 the sum of the 2 estimates equaling 100%. unpleasant images that force them to open their 388
332 Although this exercise can be performed earlier eyes and terminate the imagery session. All indi- 389
333 and later in the treatment, it is useful at this point viduals are provided with behavioral tips on how 390
334 because the patients have begun to experience to overcome unpleasant imagery (see list of 391
335 someflux in their perceptions about why they still common treatment obstacles in Box 2), but we 392
336 have nightmares. focus on acknowledging the unpleasant image 393
337 Many telltale indicators of treatment interest or and choosing to move on to a new, preferably 394
338 resistance arise from these estimates. Rarely, more pleasant or neutral image. This process is 395
339 a few individuals who believe strongly that the stated in the context of the thoughts, feelings, 396
340 nightmares are deeply entrenched in their trauma imagesparadigm,inwhichthepatientappreciates 397
341 process will deny any habit component. the natural flux in this system. That is, the mind- 398
342 Conversely, others who have completed success- body is continuously presented with new 399
343 ful psychotherapy for their traumatic exposure or thoughts, feelings and images, and when we 400
344 other mental health problems might declare their become aware of certain ones, we may choose 401
345 bad dreams must be 100% habit. The former to let go as we observe new ones emerging. 402
346 group tends to be reluctant to attempt IRT and All patients are directed to practice pleasant 403
347 should probably be discouraged from doing so imagery every day for a few minutes. The first 404
348 until some shift in their views occurs in the remain- step in this exercise is to encourage patients to 405
349 ing sessions. The latter group is not only ready to recognizethatimageryisafrequentlyexperienced 406
350 try IRT but these individuals may report decreases pathwaythatnormalsleepersoftenreportatsleep 407
351 onset.32,33 Conversely, nightmare sufferers may 408
352 in their nightmares following this session before want to improve their imagery skills but without 409
353 havinglearnedthefullIRTtechnique.Mostindivid- over stimulating themselves for fear of triggering 410
354 uals lie between these extremes (80–20, 50–50, or more disturbing images. Although few patients 411
355 20–80 splits are all common), but what is most report changes in their nightmares after using 412
interesting and informative is that nearly all of
356 UNCORRECTED 413
themreportsomeshiftintheir perceptions toward pleasant imagery during the ensuing week, their
357 habit recognition compared with what they would prospects remain high for future use of IRT 414
358 have estimated beforehand. because they experienced some perceived bene- 415
359 fits from simple imagery exercises. 416
360 Imagery Skills 417
361 Imagery Practice 418
362 The discussion now focuses on imagery, which is 419
363 a well-described behavioral therapy component To practice pleasant imagery, we use 3 possible 420
364 in the treatment of many other types of medical versions of standard instructions based on times 421
365 and psychological conditions.31 The relevant and of 1, 5, or 15 minutes and guided or unguided 422
CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.