282x Filetype PDF File size 0.96 MB Source: www.icaseonline.net
Science Education International
Vol. 27, Issue 4, 2016, 530-569
STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the
disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics
*
CHRISTINE V. McDONALD
ABSTRACT: Recent global educational initiatives and reforms have focused on
increasing the number of students pursuing STEM subjects, and ensuring students
are well-prepared, and suitably qualified to engage in STEM careers. This paper
examines the contributions of the four disciplines - Science, Technology,
Engineering and Mathematics - to the field of STEM education, and discusses
STEM literacy; factors influencing students’ engagement in STEM education;
effective pedagogical practices, and their influence on student learning and
achievement in STEM; and the role of the teacher in STEM education. Through a
critical review of 237 studies, three key factors were identified: (1) the
importance of focusing on the junior secondary phase of schooling to maintain
student interest and motivation to engage in STEM, (2) the implementation of
effective pedagogical practices to increase student interest and motivation,
st
develop 21 century competencies, and improve student achievement, and (3) the
development of high-quality teachers to positively affect students’ attitudes and
motivation towards STEM.
KEY WORDS: STEM, STEM literacy, student interest, STEM pedagogies
INTRODUCTION
Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) is a major
emphasis in global initiatives seeking to enhance economic prosperity via
a highly-educated workforce (Office of the Chief Scientist, 2014; Riegle-
Crumb, King, Grodsky, & Muller, 2012). As such, many countries have
made significant investments in STEM educational initiatives largely
driven by concerns about potential shortfalls in STEM qualified
professionals in the future (van Langen & Dekkers, 2005). The focus of
many initiatives in school education (Kindergarten-grade 12, or K-12
hereafter) is twofold; to increase the number of students pursuing STEM
subjects, and to ensure students are well-prepared and suitably qualified to
engage in STEM careers (Barker, Nugent, & Grandgenett, 2014; Bryan,
*Corresponding Author: c.mcdonald@griffith.edu.au Griffith University, Australia
530
Science Education International
Glynn & Kittleson, 2011; Sha, Schunn, & Bathgate, 2015; Vedder-Weiss
& Fortus, 2012).
STEM is an acronym commonly used to describe education or
professional practice in the areas of science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics. An authentic STEM education is expected to build students’
conceptual knowledge of the inter-related nature of science and
mathematics, in order to allow students to develop their understanding of
engineering and technology (Hernandez et al., 2014). In many schools,
STEM education is heavily focused on science and mathematics, and
generally ignores the critical role of engineering and technology in
preparing students to participate in an increasingly digital world (English,
2015). Importantly, it is recognised that interdisciplinary and
transdisciplinary approaches to STEM integration (whereby the
knowledge and skills learned in two or more STEM disciplines are
applied to real-world problems and/or used to deepen understanding),
represent the ideal approaches to implementing authentic STEM in the
classroom (STEM Task Force Report, 2014). However, the large majority
of STEM research in the field of education has been conducted from a
disciplinary perspective. As such, this paper seeks to examine and
integrate findings from this body of research. An emerging body of
research that examines STEM integration from an interdisciplinary and
transdisciplinary approach is beginning to take shape in the field (Honey,
Pearson, & Schweingruber, 2014), and this future research will provide
greater insights into effective STEM pedagogical practices in school
education.
Workforce representation in STEM is uneven, with research
indicating women are under-represented in STEM professions (Bøe,
Henriksen, Lyons, & Schreiner, 2011), particularly in mathematics,
physics, technology and engineering at the secondary and tertiary level;
and computer science and engineering at the professional level (Sullivan
& Bers, 2013). Importantly, although gender disparity is evident in the
field, meeting the projected demands of an increased STEM workforce
has only been found to be a concern in particular professional fields. For
example, current enrolments in tertiary life and health sciences are
considered to be adequate to fulfill future workplace needs, however
concerns have been raised regarding a potential shortage of qualified
engineers and ICT professionals (Bøe et al., 2011). At the school level,
research indicates that students in developed countries are reluctant to
participate in STEM subjects, particularly mathematics and physics
(Anderson, Chiu, & Yore, 2010; Hipkins & Bolstad, 2005; Lyons &
Quinn, 2010; Stine & Matthews, 2009) although interestingly, students in
developing countries display a stronger interest in engaging in STEM
subjects and professions (Sjøberg & Schreiner, 2010).
531
Science Education International
Students make decisions influencing their participation in STEM
careers during the secondary years of schooling. Around the age of 15,
students in many developed countries have the ability to choose whether
they will enroll in post-compulsory STEM subjects. As many of these
subjects are prerequisites for future study in tertiary settings, students who
elect not to study STEM subjects have fewer opportunities to engage in
society as STEM professionals (Ainley, Kos, & Nicholas; 2008). Thus,
positive experiences in the junior secondary years of schooling are critical
to facilitate future engagement in STEM subjects. Research indicates that
although most students recognise the importance of STEM to society, they
fail to see the importance of STEM to themselves as individuals. Many
students who do choose to enroll in STEM subjects in secondary school
make these decisions to aid entry into tertiary courses, as achieving highly
in STEM subjects generally facilitates higher tertiary entrance scores (Bøe
et al., 2011).
Other researchers have called for a focus on STEM in the earlier
years of schooling. Developing the competencies required to effectively
engage in STEM requires an extended time period (English & King,
2015). As such, primary schools need to ensure they are providing a
supportive teaching and learning environment to cultivate the skills and
competencies needed for effective STEM engagement in the post-
compulsory years of schooling, and beyond (Blank, 2013; Duschl,
Schweingruber, & Shouse, 2007). The implementation of effective STEM
pedagogical practices by highly qualified teachers is critical to meet this
goal.
REVIEW OF STUDIES
Research indicates that schools that do teach the four STEM disciplines
often do so in a disjointed manner, failing to integrate STEM in a unified
way (Atkinson & Mayo, 2010). An integrated STEM approach uses real-
world contexts to investigate authentic problems using active learning and
teaching approaches (Hernandez et al., 2014), leading to improved
motivation, and enhanced achievement in science and mathematics
(Furner & Kumar, 2007). This paper examines the contributions of the
four disciplines - Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics - to
the field of STEM education. In doing so, it adopts a disciplinary
approach to STEM integration (Vasquez, Sneider, & Comer, 2013)
whereby the contributions of the different disciplines are firstly examined
for evidence of best practice. Following this examination, common
themes are identified which are then amalgamated into a discussion of
532
Science Education International
STEM literacy; factors influencing students’ engagement in STEM
education; effective pedagogical practices, and their influence on student
learning and achievement in STEM; and a discussion of the role of the
teacher in STEM education.
In the first round of analysis, 25 high quality, peer-reviewed
journals (refer to Table 1) were identified in the disciplines of science
education, mathematics education, technology education, and a variety of
interdisciplinary and general education journals. A search was conducted
in all 25 journals over the period 2010-2015. Keywords used to facilitate
the search included STEM, literacy, best practice, effective pedagogies,
interest, engagement, motivation, high-quality, teachers, and achievement.
In the second round of analysis, reference lists in papers deemed relevant
from the keyword search were scrutinised and key papers from these lists
were identified and accessed. Results of the analysis yielded a total of 237
papers, which were reviewed for the present paper.
STEM LITERACY
The development of ‘literate’ citizens in the various disciplines that
encompass STEM has been an important focus in international reform
documents. STEM literacy can be defined in numerous ways, including
“STEM literacy is the ability to identify, apply, and integrate concepts
from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to understand
complex problems and to innovate to solve them” (Balka, 2011, p. 7).
However, it is more common for reform documents to provide separate
definitions of literacy from each of the four disciplines. For example, the
st
development of scientifically literate citizens is a key goal of 21 century
science education across the globe (Tytler, 2007). Scientifically literate
citizens are critical thinkers who are able to effectively deal with the
consequences of our technologically-enhanced world (Bryan et al., 2011).
The construct of scientific literacy is multi-faceted and includes the
development of competencies for lifelong learning (Bybee, 1997),
including an ability to engage in reasoning about complex societal issues
(Sabelli, 2006). For students to achieve scientific literacy they require: an
understanding of core scientific ideas, an appreciation of the variety of
methods of scientific inquiry, and an awareness of epistemological views
of science (Leuchter, Saalbach, & Hardy, 2014). Recent reform efforts in
the United States evidenced in the Next Generation Science Standards
(NGSS, 2013) promote active learning, the provision of motivational
support for science students, and the development of communities of
practice for authentic science learning (Scogin & Stuessy, 2015).
533
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.