398x Filetype PDF File size 0.45 MB Source: saspublishers.com
Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics
Abbreviated Key Title: Sch J Phys Math Stat
ISSN 2393-8056 (Print) | ISSN 2393-8064 (Online)
Journal homepage: https://saspublishers.com
Improved Estimation of Population Variance Utilizing Known Auxiliary
Parameters
1* 1
Shiv Shankar Soni , Himanshu Pandey
1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273009,
India
DOI: 10.36347/sjpms.2022.v09i06.001 | Received: 03.07.2022 | Accepted: 09.08.2022 | Published: 13.08.2022
*Corresponding author: Shiv Shankar Soni
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University Gorakhpur, Civil Lines, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh 273009,
India
Abstract Original Research Article
Even similar things, whether created artificially or naturally, can vary. We should therefore try to estimate this
variation. For improved population variance estimate, we propose a Searls ratio type estimator in the current research
employing data on the tri-mean and the third quartile of the auxiliary variable. Up to the first-degree approximation,
the suggested estimator's bias and mean squared error (MSE) are determined. The characterising scalar's ideal value is
discovered, and given this ideal value, the least MSE is discovered. The mean squared errors of the suggested
estimator and the competing estimators are contrasted conceptually and experimentally. Given that it has the lowest
MSE of the above competing estimators, the recommended estimator has been shown to be the most effective.
Keywords: Population Variance, Estimator, Main and Auxiliary variables, Bias, MSE, PRE.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s): This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial use provided the original
author and source are credited.
1. INTRODUCTION crosses through the origin, product type estimators are
One of the key indicators of dispersion is utilized to improve population variance estimation. In
population variance, which is important for making either scenario, the known auxiliary variable is used in
day-to-day business decisions. The variance is obvious conjunction with regression type estimators to improve
and occurs naturally. The literature has a very strong population variance estimation of the primary variable.
foundation for the accurate estimation of the
parameters. It is advantageous for big populations to Using the auxiliary data, Singh and Singh
reduce errors since doing so will ultimately result in (2001) proposed a ratio-type estimator for a enhanced
time and planning and decision-making cost savings. estimation of the population variance. Later, Singh and
Making accurate estimates is essential for timely Singh (2003) provided an improved regression
policymaking. The sample variance, which has the approach for estimating population variance in a two-
desirable characteristics of a good estimator, is mostly phase sample design. A useful family of chain
used to estimate variance. The sample variance of this estimators was also proposed by Jhajj et al., (2005) for
approach could be quite considerable, which is one of the elevated estimation of the population variance under
its major downsides. Finding an estimator with a the sub-sampling method. Furthermore, Shabbir and
sample distribution that is tightly distributed around the Gupta (2007) focused on the development of auxiliary
population variance is therefore necessary. As a result, parameter-based variance estimation. Then, Kadilar and
the auxiliary data is necessary to achieve this goal. Cingi (2007) proposed various enhancements to the
simple random sampling scheme's variance estimation.
The auxiliary variable, denoted by X , which Using the understanding of the kurtosis of an auxiliary
has a strong association with the study variable, denoted variable in sample surveys, Singh et al., (2008)
by Y , provides additional information. When Y and proposed a virtually impartial ratio and product type
X have a strong positive correlation and the regression estimator of the finite population variance. A correction
line of one passes through the origin, the ratio remark on the improved estimation of population
estimators are employed to estimate the enhanced variance using auxiliary parameters was reported by
population variance. When Y and X have a strong Grover (2010). Additionally, Singh and Solanki (2012)
negative correlation and the regression line of one
Citation: Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey. Improved Estimation of Population Variance Utilizing Known
Auxiliary Parameters. Sch J Phys Math Stat, 2022 Aug 9(6): 92-101. 92
Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101
proposed a novel method utilising auxiliary data for The suggested estimators and their sample
variance estimate in simple random sampling. characteristics up to the first order approximation are
described in Section 3. The efficiency comparison of
Yadav and Kadilar (2014), on the other hand, the proposed estimator with the competing estimators
suggested a two-parameter increased variance estimator and the requirements for the proposed estimator's
using auxiliary parameters. An improved family of superiority over competing estimators are explained in
estimators for estimating population variance using Section 4. The empirical research presented in Section 5
auxiliary variable quartiles was proposed by Singh and is the one in which the biases and MSEs for the actual
Pal (2016). Yadav et al., (2017) suggested an improved natural population were computed. The conclusions
variance estimator using the auxiliary variable's known drawn from the numerical study's findings are discussed
tri-mean and interquartile range. Using the well-known in Section 6. The conclusion of the results of the study
tri-mean and third quartile of the auxiliary variable, is presented in Section 7 and the paper ends with the
Yadav et al., (2019) have proposed an increased references.
estimator of the population variance. When outliers
were present, Naz et al., (2020) offered ratio-type 2. LITERATURE REVIEW
estimators of population variance and employed Let the finite population U is made up of N
unconventional dispersion measures of the auxiliary different and recognizable units U ,U ,..........,U
variable, which had a high correlation with the primary 1 2 N
variable under discussion. Olayiwola et al., (2021) and the ‘Simple Random Sampling Without
worked on a new exponential ratio estimator of Replacement’ (SRSWOR) method is used to collect a
population variance and shown improvement over many sample of size n units from this population, assuming
existing estimators of population variance. Bhushan et that Y and X has a strong correlation between them. Let
al., (2022) suggested some new modified classes of (Y , X ) be the observation on the ith unit of the
population variance utilizing the known auxiliary i i
parameters. population, i 1,2,..., N .
Sharma et al., (2022) and Searls (1964) served The most suitable estimator for population
as inspiration for this investigation. To improve the variance S2 is the sample variance s2, given by,
population variance estimation of the key variable in y y
this study, we propose a Searls type estimator and use a 2 1 n 2
t s (y y)
known population tri-mean and third quartile. Bias in 0 y n1 i
sampling is examined up to an approximation of order i1
one, and mean squared error (MSE) is as well. The
remaining portions of the essay have been divided into The variance of t0 for an approximation of degree one
sections. Review of population variance estimators for is,
the research variable using auxiliary variable V(t ) S4( 1)…………………….. (1)
parameters that are known can be found in Section 2. 0 y 40
Where,
N n N
1 1 2 1 2 1 1 rs
, S (y Y) , y y , Y y , rs ,
n N y N1 i n i N i r / 2 s / 2
i1 i1 i1 20 02
1 N
(Y Y)r(X X)s
rs N1 i i
i1
Isaki (1983) utilized the known positively correlated auxiliary information and suggested the following usual
ratio estimator of S 2 as,
y
2
t s2Sx
r y s2
x
It is a biased estimator and its MSE up to the first order of approximation is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)( 1)2( 1)]………………. (2)
r y 40 04 22
Upadhyaya and Singh (1999) used the known coefficient of kurtosis of X and introduced an estimator of S2 as,
y
© 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 93
Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101
2
t s2Sx 2
1 y s2
x 2
The MSE of t for an approximation of order one is,
1
MSE (t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)]……………… (3)
1 y 40 1 04 1 22
Where,
S2 1 N
R x and S2 (x X)2
1 S2 x N1 i
x 2 i1
Kadilar and Cingi (2006) suggested three estimators of S2 utilizing 2, and C as,
y Sx 2 x
2 2 2
t s2Sx Cx, t s2Sx2 Cx, t s2SxCx 2
2 y s2 C 3 y s2 C 4 y s2C
x x x 2 x x x 2
The MSEs of ti (i 2,3,4) for an approximation of order one is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………….. (4)
i y 40 i 04 i 22
Where,
S2 S2 S2C S
R x , R x 2 , R x x and C x
2 S2 C 3 S2 C 4 S2C x X
x x x 2 x x x 2
Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2012a) utilized the known median Md of X and proposed the following estimator of
S2as,
y
2
t s2Sx Md
5 y s2 M
x d
The MSE of t5 for an approximation of order one is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (5)
5 y 40 5 04 5 22
Where,
S2
R x
1 S2 M
x d
Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2012b) utilized the known quartiles of X and their functions and suggested the following
five estimators of S 2 as,
y
2 2 2 2 2
2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q 2 S Q
t s x 1 , t s x 3 , t s x r , t s x d , t s x a
6 y s2 Q 7 y s2 Q 8 y s2 Q 9 y s2 Q 10 y s2 Q
x 1 x 3 x r x d x a
The MSEs of ti (i 6,7,...,10) for an approximation of order one is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] …………………. (6)
i y 40 i 04 i 22
© 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 94
Shiv Shankar Soni & Himanshu Pandey., Sch J Phys Math Stat, Aug, 2022; 9(6): 92-101
Where,
S2 S2 S2 S2 S2
R x , R x , R x , R x , R x and Q Q Q ,
6 S2 Q 7 S2 Q 8 S2 Q 9 S2 Q 10 S2 Q r 3 1
x 1 x 3 x r x d x a
Q Q Q Q
Q 3 1 , Q 3 1 .
d 2 a 2
Subramani & Kumarpandiyan (2013) suggested a new estimator of S2 using known S2, M and C as,
y x d x
2
t s2SxCx Md
11 y s2C M
x x d
The MSE of t5 for an approximation of order one is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (7)
11 y 40 11 04 11 22
Where,
S2C
R x x
11 S2C M
x x d
Khan & Shabbir (2013) utilized the known third quartile Q3of X and correlation coefficient between Y and X and
suggested an estimator of S2 as,
y
2
2 S Q
t s x 3
12 y s2 Q
x 3
The MSE of t for an approximation of order one is,
12
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2 ( 1)2R ( 1)] …………………. (8)
12 y 40 12 04 12 22
Where,
S2
R x
12 S2Q
x 3
Maqbool and Javaid (2017) utilized known S2, TM and Q of X and suggested the following estimator of S2 as,
x a y
2
2 S (TM Q )
t s x a
13 y s2 (TM Q )
x a
The MSE of t13for an approximation of order one is,
MSE(t ) S4[( 1)R2( 1)2R ( 1)] ……………… (9)
13 y 40 13 04 13 22
Where,
S2 Q 2Q Q
R x and TM 1 2 3
13 S2 (TM Q ) 4
x a
Khalil et al., (2018) suggested the following three estimators of S2 using the known auxiliary parameters as,
y
2 2 2
t s2Sx CxSx, t s2Sx CxX , t s2Sx CxMd
14 y s2 C S 15 y s2 C X 16 y s2 C M
x x x x x x x d
© 2022 Scholars Journal of Physics, Mathematics and Statistics | Published by SAS Publishers, India 95
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.