297x Filetype PDF File size 0.36 MB Source: peer.asee.org
Session____
Looking Back Over 30 Years--AT&T Labs and Lucent Bell Laboratories
Ph.D. Fellowship Programs 1972 - 2002
Elaine P. Laws--AT&T Labs
During 2002, AT&T Labs and Lucent Bell Laboratories will celebrate the 30th
anniversary of their sponsorship of Ph.D. fellowship programs for under-represented
minorities 1and women in science and engineering. In the early 1970s AT&T's research
and development organization, then known as "Bell Laboratories," initiated efforts to
recruit minority students for technical positions within the Labs. These efforts were the
result of suggestions from the African American and women's communities within the
R&D organization. Since the numbers of under-represented minority and women students
graduating with Ph.D.s in disciplines relevant to the work of the Labs was very small, the
Labs leadership realized that they would have to take an active role in identifying,
encouraging, and supporting students in these groups to pursue studies in mathematics and
engineering. This paper summarizes the common histories and goals of the programs,
their launch and operation, their use of internships and mentors and the results of the
combined AT&T and Lucent programs over the 30 year period of their operation.
Introduction
Doctoral fellowship and grant programs were launched at AT&T's Bell Laboratories for
under-represented minorities in 1972 and for women in 1974. They were respectively
named the Cooperative Research Fellowship Program (CRFP) and the Graduate Research
Fellowship Program for Women (GRPW). These two programs were funded by the Bell
Laboratories research and development organization until 1992 at which time the AT&T
Foundation assumed responsibility for their funding while Bell Labs R&D staff
continued to support student recruiting, selection, internships and mentoring of students
in these programs. With AT&T's trivestiture in 1996, Bell Labs was split between AT&T
and the newly formed Lucent Technologies. The Bell Labs name was retained by
Lucent, and AT&T's R&D organization became known as AT&T Labs. The fellowship
and grant programs continued in the two companies with each company's foundations
providing funding for the programs. The students in progress in the programs were split
between the two organizations based on their disciplines and research focus and the R&D
staff of each organization continued its efforts in recruiting, selecting, and providing
internships and mentoring for the students. AT&T Labs combined the elements of the
fellowship and grant programs for minorities and women into one program and named its
program the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (ALFP) while Lucent Bell Laboratories
continued to maintain the two programs separately.
P
1 Minorities considered under-represented in engineering, mathematics, and science include African age 8.829.1
Americans, Native Americans, and Hispanics.
"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"
Fellowship and Grant Program History
In the early 1970s when the effort to develop Doctoral fellowship and grant programs
was undertaken, the Bell Laboratories R&D leadership had few models on which to base
their programs. Programs such as the National Consortium for Graduate Degrees for
Minorities in Engineering and Science (GEM) were introduced in 1974 to support
students in completing Master's degrees. Other minority fellowship programs were
initiated later, such as the National Science Foundation's Graduate Minority Fellowship
2
Program and the Ford Foundation Fellowships for Minorities that began making awards
in 1978 and 1980 respectively3. Each of these provided students with funds for graduate
study. The Bell Laboratories program, however, from its earliest beginnings sought to
build close relationships with the students chosen for its programs, providing mentoring
and summer internships for them. The early supporters of the programs took a personal
interest in the development and the success of the students. They worked to improve
recruiting efforts through close contacts with universities where promising students might
be found. They also worked with the Historically Black Colleges and Universities
(HBCUs) and Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSIs) as well as other colleges and
universities to improve and expand their undergraduate curriculums to better prepare
students for graduate school. They established committees of technical leaders to
oversee the recruitment, selection, and progress of the students and assigned technical
staff to work closely with students.
In 1970s underrepresented groups accounted for less than 2.0% of the Engineering and
Physical Science doctoral degrees awarded to American citizens and permanent residents
in the US4. In 1975 34 doctoral degrees in Engineering and 53 in the Physical sciences
were awarded to students from under-represented minority groups. As is evident from the
low number of doctoral degrees awarded to minorities 1970s, universities were not
proactive and maybe risk-adverse when dealing with minority candidates. The process of
considering and successfully guiding minorities to doctoral degrees was heavily weighted
against success. The objective was to significantly increase the number of doctoral
degrees awarded to minority candidates in technical areas of expertise present at Bell
Labs.
The first of the programs, CRFP, was started in 1972 by seeking highly qualified under-
represented minority students enrolled from universities local to New Jersey Bell Labs
facilities. The schools from which students were recruited were City College of New
York, Columbia University, New York University, Polytechnic University, Rutgers
University, Stevens Institute of Technology, and Princeton University.
Students selected for the program spent the first summer after their senior year of college
working at the Labs under the guidance of a technical mentor who was a member of the
R&D staff. Top researchers were selected as mentors. They worked closely with
students, guiding the student's work in a research project and monitoring their progress.
2 National Research Council, Minority Science Paths:National Science Foundation Minority Graduate
Fellows of 1979-81(Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press, 1995) p.1.
3 National Research Council, Ford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship Recipients (Office of Scientific and
Engineering Personnel, Fellowship Programs Unit, October 1996), p.2. P
4 National Science Foundation, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and age 8.829.2
Engineering: 2000, (NSF, 2000) NSF 00-237, Appendix B, Table 4-12.
"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"
In the fall, the students went on to graduate school but maintained a relationship with
their mentors who helped them navigate through their Ph.D. programs, acting as
sounding boards and champions for the students as well as ensuring that they were
making satisfactory progress towards their degrees. Bell Labs also provided financial
support for graduate study. Since students had their own funds to pay for school and a
stipend for their living expenses, they were not dependent on identifying funding through
their university advisors or having to take on laboratory or teaching assistantships in
order to finance their studies. This funding provided the students with full financial
support while the mentoring provided professional support not available through other
fellowship programs. In doing so, Bell Labs endorsed the student and became a
stakeholder in the student's success .
An additional feature of this program was that of the academic advisor who was selected
by the Labs to act as an advocate for students in academic matters on the company's
behalf. This neutral party could work with university graduate advisors on behalf of
students to address issues that company mentors could not handle. Examples of such
issues include interventions on behalf of students to help change the focus of their
research, change graduate advisors, or adjust their programs based on unforeseen
personal needs. In many cases this support made the difference in students being able to
successfully complete their Ph.D. studies.
In 1974 GRPW was launched as a result of the need to develop a program that would
address the challenges of women pursing advanced degrees in the sciences. The concerns
of competing in male dominated fields, the need for professional role models as well as
the competitive nature and limited funding to support advanced studies in technical
disciplines by women were contributing factors to the establishment of GRPW. In this
program the awards were equally divided between fellowships and grants, while in CRFP
only fellowships were awarded. Grants were designed to provide small annual stipends
that could be used towards expenses not generally covered by other financial awards.
Expenses covered by grants included funds for childcare, personal computing hardware
and software and visits to other university research labs. Grant students were assigned
mentors and were required to spend the first summer before attending graduate school as
interns at the Labs, establishing close connections between them and their Bell Labs
mentors.
In the early years, four to five students were identified annually for fellowship or grant
support in each of the CRFP and GRPW programs with support continuing for a five to
six year period provided students were making adequate academic progress toward the
doctoral degree. Over the years, recruitment of candidates for the programs expanded
beyond the initial local schools to include public and private universities across the
country as well as the HBCUs and HSIs. Additionally, to help identify students early in
their undergraduate careers who might have the potential to seek graduate technical
degrees, the Labs established undergraduate summer intern programs to give women and
minorities the opportunity to work in an industrial research environment. To further
reach students in high school before they went on to college, the Labs provided a week
long series of seminars and laboratory visits for high school students that gave them
exposure to the work of scientists and engineers across the Labs. P
age 8.829.3
"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"
By the 1990s, the number of students grew to a total of 16 students selected annually in
the combined programs with a portion being awarded grants. When Bell Labs was split in
1996 between AT&T and Lucent Technologies, half of the students in the programs were
designated to be supported by AT&T Labs based on their technical area of study while
and the balance were to be supported by Lucent's Bell Labs. Lucent retained the CRFP
and GRPW program names and continues to administer these programs, selecting
approximately 6 students for CRFP and 6 for GRPW annually and now providing
funding support for up to 4 years. AT&T Labs combined these two programs and
renamed the combined program the AT&T Labs Fellowship Program (ALFP). Each year
AT&T Labs selects 4 students for fellowships and 4 students for grants, half of each
being designated for under-represented minorities and the other half for women. Funding
support for students in the ALFP is renewable annually for a period of up to six years
provided the student is making satisfactory progress toward their Ph.D. Both companies
continue to support high school student awareness seminars, science fairs and laboratory
visits as well as summer intern programs for undergraduates, graduates, and post
graduates to encourage students to pursue science and engineering studies and careers.
Application and Selection to the Programs
On average, each program receives about 125 student applications annually. Of those,
about half of the applicants meet the standards of the programs. The qualifications
required for the programs include the following: the student must be beginning full-time
Ph.D. studies in a graduate program accepted by the company; must have demonstrated
high potential for success in scientific research; and must be a woman or a member of a
minority under-represented in the sciences in the U.S. Awards are given only to U.S.
citizens or permanent residents since the support provided is to help improve the number
of women and under-represented minorities in the science and technology arena in the
U.S. versus other countries across the world. To apply for a fellowship or grant,
applicants are required to complete an application to the program; provide official
transcripts of grades from all undergraduate schools attended; a written statement of
interest and their research and career goals; three letters of recommendation by college
professors who can evaluate the student's potential for research; and Graduate Record
Examination scores on the Aptitude Test and appropriate Advanced Test.
Of those students who apply, 15-25 are selected for each program for on-site interviews
during which prospective fellowship and grant candidates meet with Labs professionals
in their areas of academic interest. During the on-site company interviews, students get
to talk with and select their prospective mentors. This is an important activity since these
mentors will work to develop the initial intern assignment for the students selected and
will continue to work with and evaluate the student's progress towards completion of the
Ph.D. over the period of the fellowship or grant. Matching the candidate to a staff
member who is willing serve as a mentor to the student is essential and an award is made
only if a mentor match is found. This particular selection criterion differentiates CRFP,
GRPW and ALFP from other fellowship programs. The mentors belief in the capability
of the applicant is critical in properly supporting women and minority candidates in
P
Ph.D. studies. Over the 30 years of the programs operation this feature has been tested age 8.829.4
when student problems with faculty, or personal or technical difficulties have arisen. The
"Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education"
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.