389x Filetype PDF File size 0.69 MB Source: in.sagepub.com
CHAPTER 7
Intelligence and General
Ability Assessment
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, you will be able to
• Define intelligence
• Describe various models of intelligence
• Identify and describe various individual and group intelligence assessments
• Discuss issues in assessing intelligence
• Apply intelligence assessments to case examples
As a construct, intelligence has received a great deal of scrutiny. Since Francis Galton’s
first attempt in the 1800s, researchers have made efforts to define intelligence in a manner
that would allow for it to be readily assessed. As a result of various researchers and the
theoretical foundations of their research, numerous conceptualizations of intelligence have
been developed with coinciding strategies to assess and measure the mental aptitudes
related to intelligence definitions. From the publication of the first official intelligence test,
the Binet-Simon Intelligence Test, in 1905 to the adaptations of tests used today, the history
of intelligence tests has been marked by concerns regarding inequality.
Developed as a means to assess mental retardation from behavioral problems in chil-
dren, the Binet-Simon consisted of 30 short tasks requiring basic reasoning or what was
categorized as memory, attention, and verbal skills (Baron & Leonberger, 2012). This test
was revised in 1916 and continued to be revised into what it has become known as today,
Do not copy, post, or distribute
the Stanford-Binet. We will focus more on this assessment later in the chapter. Following
the establishment of the Stanford-Binet, intelligence tests were integrated in a variety of
settings and were even utilized during World War I to assess what individuals were suited
157
Copyright ©2015 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher.
158 SECTION II OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT AREAS
for roles in the war. Dissatisfied with the limitations of the Stanford-Binet, David Wechsler
began developing intelligence tests of his own (Baron & Leonberger, 2012). Although
Wechsler agreed with the general principles of the Stanford-Binet, he felt that various
scales needed to be developed for use with various age groups and noted the need to incor-
porate nonverbal components of testing. Several of these scales developed by Wechsler will
also be discussed in more depth throughout this chapter.
Despite the relative popularity of measures such as the Stanford-Binet and those scales
developed by Wechsler, these approaches were questioned for their relative establishment
of a single, general type of intelligence. Breaking away from a focus on singular, measurable
measures of intelligence, Raymond Cattell proposed two distinct intelligences. Fluid intel-
ligence, Cattell noted, was the type of intelligence needed for problem solving, while crys-
tallized intelligence was identified as that which a person learns. Additional information
regarding Cattell’s theory is discussed later in the chapter.
The broadening of focus by Cattell was further widened in 1983 by Howard Gardner,
who proposed seven independent intelligences. Although the evolvement of Gardner’s
theory of Multiple Intelligences will be discussed in detail later, it is relevant to note here
that Gardner’s model became the first to bring into question the accurate depiction of the
widely used intelligence quotient (IQ). Questions regarding the use of this single quotient
have surfaced quite a bit over the past decades, with various studies (e.g., Edwards, 2006;
Furnham, Boo, & McClelland, 2012; Wicherts & Dolan, 2010) demonstrating bias against
specific populations including minorities, resulting in the single IQ quotient being used to
label individuals as intellectually deficient. These concerns eventually led the American
Psychiatric Association (2013) to mandate the use of a functioning score in addition to the
IQ score in diagnosing levels of cognitive functioning. Still, intelligence testing has contin-
ued to play an important role in society by shaping the way intelligence is viewed and
directly impacting the lives of countless children and adults around the world (Anastasi &
Urbina, 1997).
In this chapter, we will examine historical intelligence theories that have helped shape
our current understanding of intelligence. In addition, we will introduce the intelligence
assessment instruments you will most likely encounter in your work as a professional
counselor. Although these instruments are of high quality and are supported by a substan-
tial amount of research (see J. R. Graham & Naglieri, 2002), they also are the subject of
considerable criticism from both the professional community and the general public. By
the end of this chapter you should be able to identify the advantages and disadvantages of
the various assessment instruments discussed and know how to effectively integrate them
into your work with the clients you serve.
INTELLIGENCE DEFINED
When you hear the term intelligence, what comes to mind? A basic definition of intelli-
gence is that it is a measure of your ability to acquire and apply knowledge. But what type
Do not copy, post, or distribute
of knowledge, and by what methods of acquisition? Is it an account of how much you have
learned through your many years of schooling? Does it refer to your ability to function as
Copyright ©2015 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher.
ChApTER 7 Intelligence and General Ability Assessment 159
a productive member of society? Or is it really an example of your ability to think
abstractly? Depending on who you talk to, intelligence can be a measure of all of these
characteristics. The construct of intelligence has been studied by researchers for over a
hundred years. To date, there still is not a consensus understanding of what exactly is intel-
ligence. A review of the professional literature reveals that there are numerous ways to
describe intelligence. The volume of unique definitions of intelligence have led some to
believe that the construct of intelligence is one that cannot be fully defined, and at best can
only be approximated (Legg & Hutter, 2006).
This lack of consensus certainly proves challenging to those seeking to measure and
assess this construct. Consequently, attempts to quantify and assess intelligence have
resulted in a history of misunderstanding, controversy, and occasional misuse (Bartholomew,
2006; Groth-Marnat, 2009; Weinberg, 1989). Although there is no single definition of intel-
ligence that is universally accepted, there are strong similarities among the many existing
definitions (Legg & Hutter, 2006). According to Sax (1997), each of the various definitions of
intelligence found in the professional literature include reference to at least one of three
primary components: origin, whether intelligence is a trait that is inherited or learned;
structure, whether intelligence is conceptualized as a singular or multidimensional con-
struct; and function, how intelligence is used by an individual and the purpose it serves.
Collectively, then, intelligence seems to be an inferred process that researchers use to
explain the different degrees of adaptive success observed in an individual’s behavior. As
you begin learning about the different models of intelligence discussed in the following sec-
tion, make note of how each theorist attended to these three components in building his
theory of intelligence. Before we review the different theories of intelligence, see Case Illus-
tration 7.1, and keep in mind the three friends that it describes.
CASE ILLUSTRATION 7.1
Think about the people in your life. Who would you classify as intelligent? When you think about the
term intelligence, what comes to mind? Do you immediately think about people like Albert Einstein?
Do you instantly think of someone who is categorized as a “genius”? What exactly is intelligence, and
how do we define it?
Let’s look at the case of three friends, all age 22, named Travis, Richard, and Xavier. All three boys
have grown up together and have been friends since the third grade. Travis is socially shy. It is difficult
for him to make friends or speak in public, and he always feels socially awkward. His only friends are
Richard and Xavier, and he has only had three girlfriends thus far in his life. All three girls approached
him. Travis graduated from high school with a 2.50 grade point average (GPA). However, Travis is
very mechanically inclined. At age 15 he was able to take apart the entire engine of his car and
rebuild it himself, with just the knowledge of one high school class in small engine repair and the
Chilton’s manual for his car. Travis can easily remember the order in which car parts go back on a car,
without having to take pictures or write himself notes. He seems to have a great memory for visual
Do not copy, post, or distribute
(Continued)
Copyright ©2015 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher.
160 SECTION II OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENT AREAS
(Continued)
or mechanical information. Currently, Travis makes his living buying broken-down cars, repairing
them, and then reselling them at a substantial profit.
Richard has no mechanical skills at all and cannot even do the simplest of repairs on his own car,
despite how many times Travis has shown him what to do. Like Travis, Richard was also not very good
at school. However, Richard has lots of friends and girlfriends. Richard has always been able to make
friends easily. He is very charismatic and comfortable in social situations. Richard can easily connect
with other people who seem drawn to him. People instantly trust Richard, and all of his friends’
parents think of Richard as another son. Over time, Richard has come to know many influential
people in the city where he grew up. Richard is always inviting Travis and Xavier to go to social events,
but Travis nearly always declines. Xavier will sometimes go as long as it does not interfere with his
academic life. Richard currently works at a local car dealership as a sales representative. He has many
repeat customers, due to his ability to make others feel comfortable and respected. Richard has been
contemplating running for public office in his city at the urging of a local politician who sees poten-
tial in Richard’s ability to connect easily with others.
Last, we have Xavier. Xavier is also not very mechanically inclined and always pays Travis to do
the routine maintenance on the car he bought from Richard. Xavier considers himself moderately
social, and while he does not make friends as easily as Richard, he doesn’t have as much difficulty
making friends as Travis. Unlike Travis and Richard, Xavier did well in school. He graduated from high
school with a 4.0 GPA and was the class valedictorian. Xavier is currently in college pursuing a degree
in law. He still maintains a 4.0 GPA in college. Xavier has a large fund of knowledge and seems to
easily apply what he has learned to many different situations. Richard and Travis call Xavier a “walk-
ing Wikipedia.” Xavier always seems to remember facts, no matter how obscure. One of Xavier’s
favorite things to do is watch shows like “Who Wants to Be a Millionaire” or “Jeopardy.” Richard and
Travis are always encouraging Xavier to apply to be on one of those shows.
After having met these three friends, if you were asked to pick which of them best demonstrates
the concept of intelligence, who would you pick? Many people would pick Xavier, because of his GPA,
his ability to remember information, and the fact that he is doing well in college while working on a
law degree. However, both Richard and Travis also demonstrate aspects of intelligence. At the end of
this chapter, return to this case and revisit these three friends. After having read the chapter, what
are your thoughts about how you would define these three friends in terms of their demonstrated
intelligence?
OVERVIEW OF INTELLIGENCE MODELS
There is an enormous amount of literature on various ways that intelligence has been con-
ceptualized. These definitions have led to the formation of theories, followed by the devel-
opment of intelligence tests. Today, many of these assessments are used in schools but may
Do not copy, post, or distribute
also be applied in counseling settings to build a more comprehensive understanding of
functioning processes, establish strengths that are important for treatment planning, and
highlight the individuality of people in the therapeutic relationship. You will discover that
Copyright ©2015 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.