333x Filetype PDF File size 1.17 MB Source: www1.health.gov.au
Pharmacy Financial
Survey
Research Report
March 2017
Quantitative research report
DRAFT
Hall & Partners | Open Mind
MEL: +61 (0)3 9662 9200
SYD: +61 (0)2 9925 7450
info@hpopenmind.com.au
Table of Contents
Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 3
Background and methodology ............................................................................................ 3
Findings from the survey ...................................................................................................... 3
Research context and objectives ........................................................................................................ 7
Methodological approach and outcomes ............................................................................................. 9
Pharmacy engagement ........................................................................................................ 10
Pharmacy data collection .................................................................................................... 12
Data analysis and limitations of the data ...................................................................... 16
Pharmacist Profiles ........................................................................................................................... 17
Summary of Profiled Pharmacies .................................................................................... 17
PROFILE 1 – PhARIA 1 ........................................................................................................ 18
PROFILE 2 – PhARIA 1 ........................................................................................................ 19
PROFILE 3* – PhARIA 2 ..................................................................................................... 21
PROFILE 4* – PhARIA 3 ..................................................................................................... 22
PROFILE 5 – PhARIA 4 ....................................................................................................... 23
PROFILE 6 – PhARIA 4 ....................................................................................................... 24
PROFILE 7 – PhARIA 5 ........................................................................................................ 25
PROFILE 8 – PhARIA 5 ....................................................................................................... 26
Appendix A: Data tables .................................................................................................................... 27
Profile of participating pharmacies ................................................................................. 27
Store size and customer numbers ..................................................................................... 29
Staff levels ................................................................................................................................ 33
Business financials ................................................................................................................ 41
PBS data – Aggregate level detailed data from the DOH ......................................... 59
PBS data – Script type level detailed data from the DOH ........................................ 64
PBS discount data – Detailed data from the DOH ...................................................... 77
PBS discount data – Script type level detailed data from the DOH ...................... 78
Stated PBS data from survey ............................................................................................. 82
Appendix B: Self-completion questionnaire and contact materials .................................................... 86
16255 – Department of Health – Pharmacy Financial Survey
Executive summary
Background and methodology
The Australian Government Department of Health is facilitating a review of pharmacy remuneration
and regulation by an independent Review Panel, which will base its recommendations on an
extensive review of pharmacy in Australia. Many voices and sources of data are part of this process,
including a range of primary and secondary data sources, stakeholder and community consultation,
public submissions, industry and publicly available data. On behalf of the Review Panel, the
Department commissioned Hall & Partners Open Mind to gather and analyse financial data from
community pharmacies to act as a further critical input into the review, supplementing existing data
sources regarding remuneration for dispensing of medicines under the Pharmaceutical Benefits
Scheme (PBS) and the delivery of professional services.
Before gathering pharmacy data, a sample list of pharmacies was compiled from multiple sources,
involving consultation with stakeholders such as The Pharmacy Guild and banner groups. Manual
cleaning and de-duplication processes were applied to produce a final list of possible participating
pharmacies. Pharmacies were contacted initially by letter from the Department of Health, to notify
them of the survey and present the survey credentials. All listed pharmacies were then contacted by
telephone to obtain the email address for an appropriate contact (such as an owner). A link to a
standardised online self-completion form was then emailed. Follow-up reminders via email and
telephone were undertaken to maximise response rates.
Despite best efforts, the data collection stage faced unforeseen challenges and the final survey
sample fell short of the target of n=300. Close to 150 pharmacies began the survey, however most of
these part-completed the survey with a final sample of n=38 completed surveys. The data collection
process is discussed in greater depth in the section Methodological Approach and Outcomes. The
data from all pharmacies who provided responses are presented here.
Findings from the survey
Characteristics of participating pharmacies
The majority of participant pharmacists were independent community pharmacies, which were
largely operated by their owner/s. Some of these had affiliations with a buying group, some were part
of a banner group, several were discount or warehouse pharmacies, and others had no affiliations.
The sample provides representation across all PhARIA classifications and types of pharmacy but the
largest single group of participants were non-affiliated, independent, PhARIA 4-6 pharmacies.
Hospital pharmacies not represented in this sample.
3
16255 – Department of Health – Pharmacy Financial Survey
The pharmacies who provided their data were most commonly positioned along shopping strips or in
isolated groups of a few shops and the majority were open for fewer than 50 hours per week. Very
few offered their customers evening or night hours - Saturday was the most common time offered
outside weekday retail hours.
2
This sample captured a spread of pharmacy sizes from small pharmacies of up to 100m , medium
2 2
sized that are 101-200 m and some very large pharmacies at more than 200 m . The pharmacies
included here most commonly allocated 11-20% of floor space to the dispensary. There is however
very wide variation when it comes to floor space allocation for OTC medicines and therapeutic
goods, relative to other retail items. Space for private consultation by the pharmacist consistently
occupied the smallest floor space of less than 10%.
There was also wide variation in the size of each pharmacy’s annual customer base - with a
tendency for PhARIA 4-6 pharmacies to have a smaller number of customers, than PhARIA 1-3
pharmacies. Around half of these pharmacies’ customers were seeking prescriptions only, while
retail-only customer sales were slightly more common for PhARIA 4-6 pharmacies.
Pharmacy ownership and staffing
The majority of participating pharmacies had one owner, this is especially so among PhARIA 4-6
pharmacies; while major city pharmacies had a greater tendency to have more than one owner. Most
pharmacies had between 1 and 5 full-time staff and about two thirds also had part-time or casual
staff to supplement this. There was a relationship between PhARIA location and staffing levels. The
majority of these PhARIA 1 pharmacies had 4 or more full-time staff and at least 2 part-time or
casual staff. While around half of the PhARIA 4-6 pharmacies had only 1 full-time staff member and
a similar proportion have 0 casual or part-time staff. Owner salaries varied widely from less than
$40,000, to a significant minority with salaries more than $100,000. This variation appears related to
PhARIA with owners' salaries for pharmacies in major cities mostly being a lot higher than those
outside metropolitan areas.
Pharmacy revenue and profit
Annual sales levels in excess of $1,000,000 was more common for city pharmacies than their
regional, rural or remote counterparts in this survey. Though some PhARIA 4-6 pharmacies did
supplement their sales with income from other sources moving them up past $1M total revenue.
Among those pharmacies providing their revenue and expense data, PhARIA 1 pharmacies tended
to achieve greater profit than PhARIA 4-5 pharmacies - virtually no participating rural or remote
pharmacies reported a profit in excess of $200,000, while half of major city pharmacies achieved at
least this level of profit.
Payments and allowances
Overall, PhARIA 1, and to a lesser extent PhARIA 2-3 pharmacies, offered and received a higher
level of remuneration for a wider range of government supported services than do those in rural or
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.