185x Filetype PDF File size 0.53 MB Source: www.economics-sociology.eu
Andrea Jankurová, Ivana ISSN 2071-789X
135
Ljudvigová, Klaudia Gubová
RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Jankurová, A. Ljudvigová, I., Gubová, K. (2017), Research of the Nature of
Leadership Activities, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 135-151. DOI:
10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/10
Andrea Jankurová, RESEARCH OF THE NATURE OF
Danubius University, LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES1
Sládkovičovo, Slovak Republic,
E-mail:
andrea.jankurova@vsdanubius.sk
ABSTRACT. Professional literature on leadership mostly
Ivana Ljudvigová, states that a leader should be like (personality traits) and
University of Economics in describes different leadership styles and types. However,
Bratislava, very little is known about what leaders do in their everyday
Bratislava, Slovak Republic, practice, or how they do it. Leadership should be seen
E-mail: ivana.ljudvigova@euba.sk more widely and should be explored along the
characteristics and style of leadership and how leaders are
Klaudia Gubová, manifested externally through their work, which means to
University of Economics in explore the nature of leadership work. The aim of the
Bratislava, research project was to gain more knowledge about the
Bratislava, Slovak Republic, activities undertaken by leaders to answer a simple, but yet
E-mail: klaudia.gubova@euba.sk not too clearly answered question: „What does a leader
really do?“ This finding will help reveal important
Received: July, 2016 activities on which best leaders focus and determine which
1st Revision: October, 2016 elements are really important for leadership. The research
Accepted: December, 2016 project was managed as a combination of interviews
conducted with leaders, people on senior management
positions along with a questionnaire survey.
DOI: 10.14254/2071-
789X.2017/10-1/10
JEL Classification: M20, Keywords: leadership, leader, leadership activities, followers.
M21, M29
Introduction
Leadership is a topic that is now a matter of high interest and attention, as reflected in
a large number of books and articles on the subject (Yukl, 2010). Despite the enormous
amount of professional and popular literature, the concept of leadership is associated with
many unanswered questions and controversial conclusions. One of the most important
theoretical problems is the lack of uniform definitions of leadership as such, resulting in a
lack of practically applicable characteristics of leadership activities. Findings presented in
literature mostly talk about how to act like leaders, emphasizing their personal
characteristics, or describing different leadership styles and types of leaders. A leader is
mostly seen as a complex entity equipped with features that make him/her ideal for the role
of a leader. Excessive research on characteristics carried out in the past decades, however,
did not reveal which features guarantee leadership success (Northouse, 2010). Practical
examples also show that the personality that does not have the selected features, still may be
1
Supported by Grant no. ITMS 26210120047.
Economics & Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017
Andrea Jankurová, Ivana ISSN 2071-789X
136
Ljudvigová, Klaudia Gubová
RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
an effective leader too (Ulrich et al., 2009). On the other hand, it cannot be explained why
leaders even though they possess leadership characteristics based on the research,
unexpectedly fail.
Looking back on the extensive research concerning the characteristics of leaders, we
know very little about what leaders actually do in their daily work, or how they do it.
Comprehensive studies on this topic exist, resulting in a completely non-specific and
metaphorical understanding of the whole concept of leadership based on personality, charisma
or holding certain positions. Leadership should be seen more widely and same applies to the
characteristics of leadership and leadership styles, as well as how are leaders manifested
outwardly through their work, what is the nature of their work. Comprehensive understanding
of leadership involves not only understanding the personality of a leader, his/her value
orientation, properties and characteristics, i.e. "Who is a leader?" and a style of leadership
used by a leader, that is, "How does he/she lead?", but also actions that a leader performs, i.e.,
"What is he/she doing in fact?"
1. Literature overview
Leadership is a concept that in managerial language, despite more than half a million
books about leaders did not have a clear and unambiguous interpretation. According to
Crainer (1995) there are about 400 definitions of leadership – "it's a real minefield of
misunderstandings and differences, through which theorists and practitioners have to walk".
The definition of leadership is arbitrary and largely subjective. Stogdill (1948) after a
comprehensive review of the literature on leadership concluded that "there are almost as many
definitions of leadership as those who have tried to define this concept". Confusion is caused
mainly due to using other misleading terms such as management, administration, power,
authority and control to describe similar phenomena. "It seems that the concept of leadership
has always escaped from us, or appears in a different form to mock with its sliding properties
and complexity. That's why we invented endless definitions to deal with it ... and now this
concept is yet not well defined", says Bennis (1959).
Leadership is defined in different ways. First, leadership occurs in groups. Leadership
is „the behavior of an individual directing the activities of a group toward a shared goal.“
(Hemphill, Coons, 1957) Similarly Northouse (2010) says that „leadership involves
influencing a group of individuals who have a common purpose“. Second, leadership is
a process or transactional event that occurs between the leader and the followers, it is not
a trait or characteristic of leader. „Leadership is realized in the process whereby one or more
individuals succeed in attempting to frame and define the reality of others“ (Smircich,
Morgan, 1982) Jacobs and Jaques (1990) pointed out that „it is a process of giving purpose to
collective effort, and causing willing effort to be expended to achieve purpose“. Similarly
Drath and Palus (1994) define leadership as „the process of making sense of what people are
doing together so that people will understand and be committed“. „Leadership then has a role
to further develop internal policies of the organization and procedures within the workplace
and to ensure such effective and ethical practices in the workplace that will reflect the values,
mission and purpose of the organization / company through a clear set of values and
principles in the context of employers and employees with respect to a particular set of
attitudes and habits of interested individuals or groups“ (Děd, Jankurová, 2015). Third,
leadership involves influence. Leadership is „the influential increment over and above
mechanical compliance with the routine directives of the organization“ (Katz, Kahn, 1978)
House et al. (1999) say that it is „the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and
enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization“. Most
definitions of leadership reflect the assumption that "it involves a process whereby intentional
Economics & Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017
Andrea Jankurová, Ivana ISSN 2071-789X
137
Ljudvigová, Klaudia Gubová
RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
influence is exerted over other people to guide, structure, and facilitate activities and
relationships in a group or organization“ (Yukl, 2010). For example „in the context of
regional development also raises the question of what types of institutions and stakeholders
should form a so-called top management with right leadership in the process of
implementation of the strategic goals and objectives“ (Čajka, Rýsová, 2008). Within that view
to the forefront of regional development also receive such aspects as regional identity of
actors active in the regional context (see more Dušek, 2007, 2014 and 2015). Similarly
Northouse (2010) defines leadership as "the process whereby an individual influences a group
of people to achieve common objectives" and Rauch and Behling (1984) as „the process of
influencing the activities of an organized group toward goal achivement“. The increase of
organized group´s innovative capacity can only be achieved by means of supporting
intelligent investment. Investment into education, research and development will manifest
itself positively in the sustainability of total growth of organization (Terem, 2013; Čajka et
al., 2012).
On the other hand, the interpretation of leadership differ mainly in defining how a
leader carries out its influence and determining what is the result of effort to influence. The
issue of leadership is analyzed by Weber in the political spfere. „Weber's concept highlights
the power of political elites who rule and are a major pillar of stability of the company, which
in the case of establishing direct democracy faces extinction“ (Kováčová, 2014).
Very often definitions appear which have a historical, psychological and sociological
importance, however, are not applicable to modern business and management, for example
leader as a servant, leader as a media product. Some definitions are therefore more useful than
others, but there is no definition that would capture the essence of leadership and would be
sufficiently general to all situations. Theoretical knowledge of leadership shows the necessity
to perceive the function of management and broad experience proves it. Under these
circumstances, it is preferable to use different concept of leadership as a source of different
perspectives on this complex and multifaceted phenomenon. Karmel (1978) also
recommends: "Whenever feasible, leadership research should be designed to provide
information relevant to a wide range of definitions, so that in time it will be possible to
compare the usefulness of different approaches and come to some kind of conformity in this
case".
While several similarities and differences surround the ideas of two theorists
leadershipstyles, the most obvious comparison is that they both deal with perceptions and
assumptions about people. These perceptions tend to take the form of how management views
employees, while Ouchi's Theory Z takes this notion of perceptions a bit farther and talks
about how the workers might perceive management. Jasaňová (2002) shows a comparison
and contrast of the two theorists, and how they might apply the concepts shown to their
particular management theories.
Part of the answer to the question of what leaders actually do, can be found in an
unlimited number of definitions of leadership. Northouse (2010) states that during the past
sixty years more than 65 different classification systems were developed to define the
dimensions of leadership. Burns (1978) defines that "leadership is exercised when persons
mobilize institutional, political, psychological, and other resources so as to arouse, engage,
and satisfy the motives of followers“. Richards and Engle (1986) consider that "leadership is a
formulation of a vision, embodied values and creating an environment in which things can be
done". House et al. (1997) define leadership as "the ability of an individual to influence,
motivate and enable others to contribute effectiveness and success of an organization".
Donnelly et al. (1997) talk about leadership as "the ability to persuade others", the definition
Kotter (1992) points out is that "a leader inspires to achieve vision, regardless of the
complications". Schein (1992) says that leadership „is the ability to start evolutionary change
Economics & Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017
Andrea Jankurová, Ivana ISSN 2071-789X
138
Ljudvigová, Klaudia Gubová
RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
processes that are more adaptive“. Nowadays, it is necessary to examine the definition of
leadership as knowledge-oriented leadership – in the field of knowledge management as as
deal for example Donate and Sánchez de Pablo (2014)
Based on definitions above, we can state that leaders influence, formulate a vision,
motivate, inspire, mobilize, leading change etc.
In carrying out the research project, we assumed that leaders in their leadership
activities affect their employees, but are also used at the same time, inspired by their
surroundings, but also affect people through their charisma, encouraging their colleagues, but
in some situations before they mobilize, inspiring trust, but their relations with staff are also
based on undertakings made up of followers, while raising their successors.
2. Aim and research methods
The inspiration for the research project was the study of Henry Mintzberg, one of the
leading academics who have studied management. Mintzberg conducted research and its aim
was to find out how managers actually do their jobs. His findings were published in 1973. The
results were surprising. Mintzberg concluded that managers do not perform traditional
management functions, namely planning, organizing and control, but carry out interpersonal,
informational and decision-making activities. This means that most of the time managers
work at representative roles, the roles of spokesman, resource allocator and negotiator.
Supplemented and more complex model of managing (model of the manager's job) H.
Mintzberg published in 1994. Same as Henry Mintzberg looked at managers, we decided to
explore the leaders and find out what activities do leaders really perform whether these
activities are consistent with what is suggested by the literature.
Research of leadership activities is rare and does not have complex nature. Mission of
submitted article is to clarify this a little researched area of leadership and to contribute a little
to the set of konwledge about leadership activities, which will create conceptual knowledge.
Presented research project is a „snapshot“ study that explores the most important (basic)
leadership activities. The main objective of the research project was to learn more about the
activities undertaken by the leaders and by experience to answer a simple, but yet not too
clearly answered question: "What really makes a leader?" This finding helps us to reveal
important activities that the best leaders focused on and determine which elements are really
important for leadership. These findings further help and guide in training of successors to
leadership roles, and so to improve the next generation of leaders.
The result of the main objective are the following sub-objectives of the research
project, based on a complex characteristic of leadership:
to explain how a leader use their power and influence in practice, how they influence
events in the business and what tools they use,
describe the ways and means used by a leader to inspire followers,
deepen and broaden the knowledge of when and how a leader mobilizes and encourages
their employees,
clarify what makes a leader, to enhance people's confidence towards them and used
obligations in their work with people.
The research project was conducted jointly by Department of Management, University
of Economics in Bratislava and recruiter KINGFISHER Executive Search in 2014-2015. The
research project was attended by leaders at the top level in the organization (top
management). Research sample consists of top leaders (CEO, chairman of the board) of big
companies, that have hundreds of employees, so we assured consistency across the subjects of
research. Survey sample consists of leaders from different sectors (IT, financial sector, food
industry, construction industry...). The research sample consists of leaders from Slovak
Economics & Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.