276x Filetype PDF File size 0.62 MB Source: www.witpress.com
Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X
The Dirac delta function and its use in plate
bending problems under generalized loading
A. El-Zafrany
School of Mechanical Engineering, Cranfield University,
Email: a. el-zafrany @ cranfield. ac. uk
Abstract
In this paper, after a brief introduction on the Dirac delta function and its
interesting properties, some of its applications to the boundary element analysis
of thick plates in bending are introduced. Modelling of concentrated shear forces
and bending moments in boundary integral equations is firstly discussed. Then
the treatment of domain loading terms for plate bending problems under line
loading is explained, where line shear forces and bending moments are assumed
acting on arbitrary curves defined on the plate midplane. Some numerical
examples are demonstrated and the results were compared with corresponding
analytical solutions. It is clear that, with the use of Dirac delta functions, the
boundary element analysis of thick plates in bending, with general cases of
loading, has been simplified, and very accurate results were obtained.
1 Introduction
The delta function was introduced by Dirac' as a quantity b(x)
depending on a parameter jc, and satisfying the conditions:
Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X
244 Boundary Element Research In Europe
oo
f&(x)dx = l, 6(a) =0 for x*Q (1)
— oo
with the following interesting property:
oo
ff(x)&(x-a)dx=f(a) (2)
— oo
Dirac considered that 6(x) is not a function of x according to the usual
mathematical definition of a function, and he preferred for it to be
classified as an improper function. This inspired mathematicians to use the
term Generalized Functions for the 8 function and similar other functions,
and Schwartz^ systemized the theory of such generalized functions. A
simple presentation of their theory is also given by Hoskins.^
The derivatives of delta functions are also treated as generalized
functions. Although such derivatives are defined by means of an integral
expression,^ it is acceptable to define the derivatives using first principles
or limit rules. Jaswon & Symnf emphasized the fact that the use of delta
functions provides a quick approach to results, specially boundary integral
equation derivations, which could otherwise be obtained by limiting
processes of classical analysis. El-Zafrany^ has simplified the definition
of Dirac delta functions in multiple-dimensional space, and allocated
physical or geometrical meanings to two-dimensional, three-dimensional,
and axisymmetric delta functions.
A Dirac delta function may be defined in a ^-dimensional space, in
terms of one-dimensional delta functions, as follows:
where x = ix^ x^ "' xA
which represents a vector of Cartesian coordinates. If / is a finite
function defined within a d-dimensional domain A, then:
= /(*,) (4)
Q
where *, is inside the domain £1 If the previous function has also finite
partial derivatives up to the mth order, then it can be shown that:
Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X
Boundary Element Research In Europe 245
/» 3tn &/*._*. \
*"**> (5)
I -\ tn-I m-l
where l<,m.
In this paper, the use of Dirac delta function in modelling generalized
loading cases, and their applications to boundary element analysis of thick
plates in bending are demonstrated. Modelling of concentrated shear
forces and bending moments in boundary integral equations is firstly
discussed. Then the treatment of domain loading terms for plate bending
problems under line loading is explained, where shear forces and bending
moments are assumed acting on arbitrary curves defined on the plate
midplane.
2 Plate bending example
The boundary integral equations for thick plates in bending can be derived
and expressed in the following fornf:
(6)
+
r
(7)
i(6J, + (32(6,), + ^33^, + f (7i3 8. + T^Q, + 7-33^) dT
(8)
and the kernel functions in the domain loading integrals can be simplified
as follows®:
* V|^2-, L, =11 - ^-*' V*|»' (9)
(l-v)A^ j a%«' ' [ (l-v)X
Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 19, © 1998 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-355X
246 Boundary Element Research In Europe
where 4>* = — (logz-1), V*4>* = M^ (10)
on D 2 7t D
and z = Ar, (^
3 Case of concentrated forces and moments
3.1 Representation in terms of domain loading intensity
Concentrated forces and moments may be represented in terms of
distributions over the domain, using Dirac delta functions, as explained
next.
(a) Case of a concentrated force
Consider the case where a concentrated force F in the z direction is acting
on a plate at midplane point (*,, y,) . Defining a small circle of radius e
centred at (x^y^, as shown in Figure 1, then an equivalent loading
intensity can be defined as follows:
p
q(x,y) = 0 for r > 0, q(x,y) = lim — - for r - 0
€-0 7t€^
where r = J(x -xrf + (y -yrf .
Hence, it can be deduced from the definition of two-dimensional Dirac
delta functions* that:
(b) Case of a concentrated moment
A concentrated moment Ty in the y direction, acting at (*,,?/), can be
represented by a couple of two forces, as shown in Figure 2, where:
T
FZ = -FI = lim -±
*
Using the previous analysis, the loading intensity equivalent to every force
can be expressed as follows:
x „ ., \ ,- r «(*-* y-y,)
q(FJ = Fi6(*-jc,,y-yj) = - lim -^-
AJC
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.