321x Filetype PDF File size 0.46 MB Source: ec.europa.eu
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE
Institute for Environment and Sustainability
H08 Sustainability Assessment Unit
Analysis of Existing
Environmental Footprint
Methodologies for
Products and
Organizations:
Recommendations,
Rationale, and Alignment
Deliverable 1 to the Administrative Arrangement
between DG Environment and Joint Research
Centre No. N 070307/2009/552517, including
Amendment No 1 from December 2010.
European Commission (EC)
Joint Research Centre(JRC)
Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
Authors: Kirana Chomkhamsri, Nathan Pelletier
Project Leader and main reviewer: Rana Pant
Action Leader and reviewer: David Pennington
Approved: Constantin Ciupagea (HoU) (April 29, 2011)
Ispra, Italy, November 2011, updated after feedback by ADEME, DEFRA, WRI, ISO
1
Content
Content...................................................................................................................................................2
Executive summary.................................................................................................................................3
1. Abbreviations......................................................................................................................................5
2. Glossary...............................................................................................................................................6
3. Procedure of Analysis..........................................................................................................................7
3.1 Methodological issues considered for product environmental footprinting...................................7
3.2 Methodological issues considered for corporate environmental footprinting..............................12
4. Short description of analyzed methods............................................................................................14
4.1 Product Environmental Footprint...................................................................................................14
4.2 Corporate Environmental Footprint...............................................................................................16
5. Results of the analysis of existing methods......................................................................................20
5.1 Product Environmental Footprint...................................................................................................20
5.2 Corporate Environmental Footprint...............................................................................................43
6.1 General issues.................................................................................................................................57
6.2 Common approaches......................................................................................................................57
6.3 Divergent approaches.....................................................................................................................58
2
Executive summary
The “Analysis of Existing Environmental Footprint Methodologies for Products and
Organizations” forms the starting point for the development of a harmonized European
methodology for environmental footprint that can accommodate a broad suite of relevant
environmental performance criteria, including greenhouse gas emissions. The results suggest
that advancing European guidance documents that provide for a greater degree of
methodological specificity than existing methods and standards is required to move towards
more consistency and reproducibility of results. This will be much more challenging for the
company side where, in contrast to product footprint, life cycle approaches have not
previously played an important role.
Background and policy context
In the context of increasing global awareness of anthropogenic climate change, the carbon
footprint concept is now widely used both as a marketing tool and to mobilize public
sentiment. In its conclusions on the Sustainable Consumption and Production Action Plan the
Council invited the Commission "taking into account Member States' experience, to start
working as soon as possible on common voluntary methodologies facilitating the future
establishment of carbon audits for organizations and the calculation of the carbon footprint of
products".
As a follow-up to the Council conclusions, the European Commission concluded a study on
product and corporate Carbon Footprint methods that involved analyzing existing
methodologies and initiatives and how they might relate to future policies. One of the main
outcomes of this study was that it is important to take into consideration all environmental
impacts of products in a balanced way in place of sole focus on greenhouse gas emissions.
Recently, in its conclusion on the "Sustainable materials management and sustainable
production and consumption" (December 2010), the European Council invited the
Commission to "develop a common methodology on the quantitative assessment of
environmental impacts of products, throughout their life-cycle, in order to support the
assessment and labeling of products".
The European Commission therefore decided to extend the work on carbon footprinting to
include other environmental aspects. Thus, the Product and Corporate Environmental
Footprint project was initiated with the aim of developing a harmonized European
methodology for environmental footprinting that can accommodate a broader suite of relevant
environmental performance criteria.
Scope and objectives
This analysis focuses on key methodologies and standards (or drafts thereof) that aim at
calculating the environmental footprint of products and organizations. Seven product-specific
and seven organization-specific methodologies are considered. The analysis does not include
issues related to communication. Rather, the intention of this study is to provide a more
detailed analysis of the selected methodologies as a basis for formulating guidance and
requirements for a common European environmental footprint methodology. Key
methodological decision points in existing standards are compared. Subsequently,
recommendations and supporting rationale are advanced for each decision point as
necessary to move towards more reproducible product and corporate environmental footprint.
Results of the analysis
3
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.