174x Filetype PDF File size 0.24 MB Source: www.hrpub.org
Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance 9(4): 722-734, 2021 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujaf.2021.090418 Making Environmental Accounting Work: Case of the Zimbabwe Mining Industry 1,* 2 2 2 Otekunrin Adegbola Olubukola , Samu Tafadzwa , Sifile Obert , Matowanyika Kudzanai 1Department of Accounting and Finance, Landmark University, Nigeria 2Graduate School of Business, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Chinhoyi, Zimbabwe Received December 15, 2020; Revised February 7, 2021; Accepted March 1, 2021 Cite This Paper in the following Citation Styles (a):[1] Otekunrin Adegbola Olubukola, Samu Tafadzwa, Sifile Obert, Matowanyika Kudzanai , "Making Environmental Accounting Work: Case of the Zimbabwe Mining Industry," Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol.9, No.4, pp.722-734 ,2021. DOI:10.13189/ujaf.2021.090418. (b): Otekunrin Adegbola Olubukola, Samu Tafadzwa, Sifile Obert, Matowanyika Kudzanai (2021). Making Environmental Accounting Work: Case of the Zimbabwe Mining Industry, Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(4), 722-734. DOI:10.13189/ujaf.2021.090418. Copyright©2021 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License4.0 International License Abstract The research sought to find out how environmental accounting guidelines. The research environmental accounting can work in Zimbabwean recommended that government organisations monitor and Mining Companies. Descriptive research design was used control mining activities independent of politics and and mixture of qualitative and quantitative data was commit both human and financial resources towards collected using questionnaires and interviews. Stratified researching on how best environmental accounting can be purposeful sampling of 52 respondents was made up of 16 implemented. Mining Companies' executives which are dominant Keywords Environmental Accounting, Sustainable companies in mining gold, nickel, asbestos, coal, copper Strategy, Mining Industry and chromite, 20 government organisations representatives and 16 mining communities’ heads (8 Chiefs and 8 Headmen) were done. Community heads were interviewed and questionnaires were sent to Mining Companies' executives and government organisations representatives 1. Introduction who were also interviewed two months after. The research The earth has been faced with dire consequences of reveals that government is not doing enough in fostering businesses turning a blind eye on nature as they pursue the implementation of environmental accounting in economic benefits. Ainapur and Rao [1] assert that Zimbabwe. There is no commitment of enough resources businesses operate in an environment and their economic by the government towards adoption of environmental success hinges on what the environment has. Possessions accounting. The mining sector has been politicized, of the environment are at the mercy of these businesses as making it difficult to enforce environmental laws in this they keep posing a danger to the existence of flora and sector whilst on the other hand there are no effective laws fauna [61], [77]. Unsustainable business operations have and policies that regulate environmental accounting issues. resulted in the world’s most devastating calamities as well The core existences of economic instability and political as human rights infringements [31], [61]. Williams [100] upheavals in the nation have forced firms to concentrate on says that all creatures need to enjoy what the universe their continued economic existence, doing almost nothing on environmental accounting. It was also noted that there is offers, not only the human being. U.S Green house Gas m Inventory Report [105] and U.N. Food and Agriculture no proper monitoring and controlling of ining activities by law enforcers, leaving the natural environment Organisation [94] have blamed industrial activities for subjected to unsustainable mining activities. There are no major environmental pollutions which will continue to Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance 9(4): 722-734, 2021 723 rise unless governments intervene. This has contributed 1.1. Research Objectives immensely to ecosystem and climate changes [99], [90], (1) To establish factors that hinders the mining [12]. Zimbabwe has no comprehensive data on levels of companies from embarking on environmental pollution but the pollution level is worrisome. Businesses accounting. need to consider the costs of their environmental damages (2) To identify if making environmental accounting work and fully incorporate them in their profits computations as can be a strategic sustainable resource management well as their decision making. There is ample evidence tool in the mining sector in Zimbabwe. that fighting nature is fighting you [14], [24]. This is (3) To determine the role of government in fostering explained by devastating calamities that have befallen environmental accounting in the mining sector. human being. In 2018, Zimbabwe was hit by serious (4) To ascertain the implications to the mining sector of floods that killed and injured an unconfirmed number of adopting environmental accounting. people and livestock leaving tens of thousands of people homeless. Global temperature has been increasing making life uncomfortable for earth’s inhabitants [77], [7]. There 2. Literature Review has been a tremendous prise of societies, government sanctioned and non-government sanctioned organisations 2.1. Theoretical Literature against firms that are a danger to the environment and the societies they operate in [65], [73]. Environmental 2.1.1. The Green Political Theory accounting has become a pertinent growing source of The theory emerged in recognition of the global concern to businesses globally as the world seeks to attain environmental crisis where perpetual destruction of nature sustainable development environmentally [68], [56], [69], has become problematic [40]. Green Theory is embroiled [101], [107]. with a health warning in which nature is considered to be Firms need to admit having more responsibilities a crucial entity in its own right. The theory is engrained besides solely meeting shareholders’ expectations [15], with the idea that the planet earth was not created for [32], [81]. Malaysia, United Kingdom, Canada, South humans alone, but all life. The theory is centered on Africa among others nations have been heavily punishing idealising the co-existence of humans and non-humans companies for activities that cause environmental damage and their relationship [76]. The green political theory as well as pushing for environmental accounting audits. advocates for an eco-centric approach and abandonment Environmental accounting has either been voluntary or of the anthropocentric world view in which more value is mandatory. Mandatory environmental accounting has placed on the survival of humans instead of the whole been accepted and supported by most organisations in ecosystem [97]. The green political theory has America, Australia, Asia and Europe [91], [55]. In Africa environmental ethics at it realm. Its ethical stance stems a few countries such as South Africa, Kenya, Namibia and from the philosophies developed by Gandhi and Spinoza Botswana have mandated environmental accounting as who advocated for everyone to do things with a foresight requirement for companies to be listed on the stock and care for other things that exist now and their exchange [48]. generations to come. On this basis, moral choice should Some developed nations have introduced green tax [19] then be the source of every decision [88]. The ideology which is a tax levied on products or services that harm the behind this theory is based on creation of a world that is environment. This is meant to discourage use or ecologically sustainable (a world that is rooted in social consumption of goods / products and services that are not justice, environmentalism and non-violence) [73]. Human environmentally friendly [4]. The ecosystem accounts beings are a minor component on earth hence questioning contain maps, accounting tables and monetary value of the the idea that humans are more superior to anything that is Ecosystem Capital [95]. The ecosystem accounting constituted in nature. The theory seeks to address approach is grounded in the System of socio-ecological problems hence strengthening the Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) which was capacity to attain sustainability globally. The green developed by the U.N Committee on Environmental political principles drive for sustainable environmental Economic Accounting. In Zimbabwe, companies still management which saves nature. primarily focus on profit motives [102] escalating 2.1.2. The Stakeholder Theory degradation of the environment [9], [92], [62]. The Zimbabwean Mining Sector has to account for The popular word ‘‘Stakeholder’’ first appeared in environmental costs. Contrast to other legislations, the 1963 through the Stanford Institute of research [16] Zimbabwean laws is silent on this. Moreover there are no countering the ideology that the stockholders are the only sound sustainable strategies that give room for the group that management should focus on when making initiation of environmental accounting as far as the decisions [38]. Edward Freeman, the pioneer of Zimbabwe Mining Sector is concerned. Stakeholder Theory describes stakeholders as internal and 724 Making Environmental Accounting Work: Case of the Zimbabwe Mining Industry external groups of people that have and can be influenced environmental issues [86], [96], [35], [71]. by the activities of the businesses. The theory seeks to Lack of adequate resources and dedication towards devise ways in which organisations can reap maximum implementation of environmental accounting has been benefits by being responsive to all stakeholders. The encountered by many nations [103]. George, Siti-Nabiha, fundamentals of the theory insinuate that there should be Jalaludin & Abdalla [39] articulate that insufficient funds, existence of relationships between organisations and their absents of appropriate human capital, unavailability of various stakeholders, and there should be equality expertise and knowledge are the major problems in between different stakeholders [60], [75]. The stakeholder implementing environmental accounting practices. concept requires businesses to consider the welfare of Environmental accounting is considered to be at its infant societies, nature and be ethical. The theory is a driving stage in most countries hence there is limited expertise in force for firms to be more concerned and conscientious in this area and this proves to be problematic when it comes every function they undertake taking into consideration to its implementation especially in developing nations the effects of their activities on its stakeholders and the [17], [72]. In some cases, lucrative business projects out natural environment hence achieving social and compete sustainable projects especially in developing environmental accounting [22]. Businesses that apply the nations, making finance the greatest challenge in adopting stakeholder theory are perceived to be more environmental accounting in such scenarios [54]. environmentally considerate and they strive to embark on Non-alignment of thoughts and goals between financial activities which do not harm the environment [75]. teams and environmental advocates is a significant barrier to implementation of environmental accounting. There is a 2.1.3. Institutional Theory divergence of priorities in most cases between The theory suggests that organisations conform to sustainability teams and financial team members within well-known rules as well as norms of governing organisations. The financial management team is seen to institutions to get support and be perceived as legitimate be more influential and possess the power to key decision [83]. The theory explains show changes in societal values, making, hence sustainability teams tend to have little or technological improvement, as well as regulations can no influence as decision makers hence making influence decisions about environmental accounting [3]. environmental accounting of little or no effect. This leads In this case organisations exist in an institutional to environmental issues not being fully incorporated into environment and these institutions create expectations that the business strategy [5], [80]. Environmental issues are enhance legitimacy practices for firms and they have not easily measured and quantified. Without the existence powers to influence individual company’s activities [93]. of an apparent means to price environmental costs such as These institutions have the power to stop or shape pollution and climate change it is difficult to include these organisational behaviours, decisions and goals [64], [53], issues as part of accounting and decision making. This [74]. The institutional environment pushes the companies then implies that even when firms try to implement into focusing on the implementation of environmental environmental accounting, they may not be fully aware of accounting practices that can meet the expectations of the actual costs and problems associated with their these institutional organisations. Institutional theory activities in the long run [51]. clearly show firm’s actions or behaviour can be governed 2.2.2. Strategies of Implementing Environmental by its institutional environment [23]. Accounting The ecosystem accounts contain maps, accounting 2.2. Empirical Review tables and monetary value of the Ecosystem Capital [95] 2.2.1. Factors Hindering the Implementation of The ecosystem accounting approach is grounded in the Environmental Accounting System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) which was developed by the U.N Committee on Impediments to environmental accounting practices can Environmental Economic Accounting (UN System of be country specific, continent specific, firms specific or Environmental Economic Accounting (SEEA) [95]. The industry’s specific [103]. One of the factors that hinder the ecosystem accounts produced in Netherlands presented a implementation of environmental accounting process is comprehensive over view of ecosystem capital which that it is a complicated accounting procedure [59]. The included services provided by the ecosystem and the rise of many initiatives towards environmental accounting interdependencies of the economic activities to these by many different international bodies has led to no ecosystems. This has allowed the measurement in change shared consensus among practitioners hence lacking of the ecosystem capital and has assisted the nation in comparability [35], [79], [18]. It has been difficult for environmental management [26]. The introduction of firms to decide on which framework to adopt; currently Green Tax in the United States, which is levied on there is unavailability of a single framework that guides products or services that harm the environment, has been environmental accounting and reporting process. There is very successful such that more than 10% of the revenue no agreed basis of evaluating the quality and reliability of generated by the federal government is from Green Tax. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance 9(4): 722-734, 2021 725 This has pushed companies to be environmentally friendly businesses in addressing challenges they faced as they try [30], [46]. to implement Environmental Accounting. The provision 2.2.3. The Role of Governments in Implementing of state-issued information and guidance aided business to Environmental Accounting be aware of predominant Environmental Accounting issues and provided the basis for strategy formulation in Governments are gradually getting involved in fostering tackling the problems faced by firms in implementing the adoption of environmental accounting especially in environmental accounting. Asia, America and Europe, where protection and Where environmental accounting has been promotion of social objectives are considered to be very implemented, the governments in such nations have to a crucial [98]. In UK, environmental accounting has gained larger extend been involved in environmental accounting prominence such that it has become government’s priority standard setting through the provision of policy on public agendas [6]. In particular the governments have framework, which pushes organisations beyond minimum an important role in developing legislations and legal standards [78]. Government plays a crucial role in regulations that controls the implementation and adoption policy-making which is crucial in promoting as well as continued monitoring of environmental environmental accounting at national level, encouraging accounting practices [25].The success of environmental tightening of laws that enhance environmental accounting. accounting is in the government’s ability in providing a Canada has enacted numerous policies that seek to framework for regulations and its ability to enhance the promote environmental accounting implementation. Since means by which to monitor compliance by firms. the inception of the Canadian Environmental Protection Governments have an important role in environmental Act in 1999 several policies have been introduced and accounting standard setting through the provision of several amendments have been made to the act and more policy framework and making sure international financial additions have been engrossed in the act so as to address reporting standard is complied with [106]. Canadian and current environmental issues [87]. Philippians governments have been very successful in Integrating and collaborating with other international doing that [49]. South Africa has also come up with organisation that are pushing for environmental protection similar legislations which seek to support the King lll such as the United nation is one of the ways in which code of governance which also advocate for developed nations have managed to make environmental environmental and social accounting [50]. Governments accounting work in their nations. This has been made are also in a better position in pushing for SEEA possible by entering into agreements and treaties. Canada principles and countries such as Botswana, Namibia and and Norway have entered in several of such agreements Australia are leading in pushing for the adoption of SEEA with various organisations such as the Organisation for in Environmental accounting practices. More so the Economic and Cooperation and Development (OECD) government stands a better place in raising awareness and and the North American Commission for Environmental builds the pillars for environmental accounting Cooperation. The government of China, Us and Germany implementation by organisation as they do have their have been the leaders in promoting environmental sources and influence. Germany started to consider the accounting through the introduction of clean technology. adoption of environmental accounts in the1980s and very In United States, the federal government has invested successful results were yielded [57]. The more people are more than $1.8 billion in clean technology and more aware of environmental problems caused by unsustainable money resources are expected to be channelled into the business operations, the more likely that attention will be adoption of clean technology [78]. Helping business in diverted towards identifying solutions to address these adopting clean technology is also another way in which environmental challenges. This implies that people have government scan foster for environmental accounting. to be made aware of the negative implications of being 2.2.4. Implications of Adopting Environmental Accounting reckless to the environment. This can be broadcasted on 2.2.4.1. Benefits of Environmental Accounting radio and television stations. Some governments in Europe have also been acting as Environmental accounting accrues an extensive providers of information to firms that desire to implement spectrum of benefits to the business organisation that Environmental Accounting, Netherlands being the best in implements it [10], [37]. One of the benefits doing so [8]. The Dutch government when the environmental accounting is that it will reduce pressure implementation of Environmental Accounting was still at from stakeholders. It is evident that businesses are facing its initial stage, sourced information from other nations continued increase in pressure from stakeholders over which were already practicing Environmental Accounting their need to recognise the damage they are causing to the and made it available to local firms through initiatives that environment. Environmental accounting helps companies included websites, radio and television channels that avoid such pressures and encourage firms to innovate and informed the society on how to adopt Environmental come up with ways of reducing environmental harm and Accounting. The Netherlands Government aided strategies to enhance sustainable resource management
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.