334x Filetype PDF File size 2.07 MB Source: aspb.org
How to Read a Scientific Paper
What is a scientific paper? ………………………..…….. 2
Scientific papers are peer‐reviewed....……….....… 3
Anatomy of a scientific paper ……………………….... 4
How to read a scientific paper ………………………… 5
Ethics in research and publishing………………….... 6
Understanding numerical data ……….…………….… 7
What does “statistical significance” mean? ....... 8
Case study: Buy My Oranges……………..……………..9
Appendix: Numerical analysis .....……………….... 12
Additional resources and credits ………………… 13
What is a scientific paper?
Scientific papers go straight to the use in new ways to address different
source questions.
If someone asks you about a new
movie you haven’t seen yet, what do The authors of scientific papers also
you say? Maybe, “I haven’t seen it, but provide an interpretation of what they
I’ve heard it’s good.” We generally try to think their new information means and
distinguish first-hand from second-hand how it contributes to our understanding
of how the natural world works. By
presenting the data itself as well as the
analysis, other authors can evaluate
these interpretations for themselves.
Because our understanding is always
changing, sometimes the
interpretations of the data can be re-
evaluated in light of new ideas and new
data.
Society needs scientific literature
Much scientific research is publicly
information. Like the children’s game of funded, and the knowledge and
“telephone,” information can change as technologies that emerge from
it is passed along. To get the real story, research have social impacts.
whether a film review or the results of a Traditionally, the output from scientific
new research study, go to the source. research has been published in
journals that are not widely available
Scientific papers present data and outside of university libraries, but in the
interpretations past decade there has been a trend
Scientists report the results of their toward increasing openness in science
research by writing and publishing and a desire to make research articles
scientific papers, which are written in a more broadly available. However, it is
very formal style. One of the objectives not sufficient to make these resources
of a scientific paper is to make available, as in many cases they are
available the data from a set of studies written for experts and practicing
so that others can learn from them and scientists and therefore not readily
build on them to address new comprehensible to those who haven’t
questions. By publishing and sharing been trained in the discipline. We’ve
data, scientists work together to written this article as a guide to help
advance our understanding. Some people learn to read the scientific
articles include results from a few literature, with the goal of increasing
targeted studies, and others present access to science and communication
large datasets that other scientists can about science.
Copyright 2013 American Society of Plant Biologists. www.aspb.org
Sccientiific ppaperrs aree peeer-revviewwed
Peer revieew is a traddition in sccholarly ee performeed or that the analysis of the
b
publication. Prior to publicationn, an article reesults be reevised.
is evaluated by otheer experts, usually
anonymouusly, and these evaluuations aree MMost of the articles of the “masss media”
used to immprove thee paper. Thhe reviewers (nnewspaperrs, magazinnes, and bblogs) are
may recommmend thaat additional data be noot subject tto peer revview. Althoough they
cientific
collected and analyzzed or thatt claims noot caan be effecctive at intrroducing s
well suppoorted by thhe data be removed. toopics to a bbroader audience, theey are not
allways sufficiently cauutious in thheir
In the stanndard
process, sshown
to the righht, the
authors suubmit
their papeer to a
journal edditor,
who evaluuates
whether thhe topic
is a good match
for the jo
uurnal. If
so, the paaper is
sent to twwo or
more expeerts,
who read it and
provide thheir
frank evalluations, annalysis of tthe results of the studdy and
including wwhether thhe conclusiions are soometimes overstate tthe conclussions. For
supportedd by the evvidence andd whether exxample, the mass meedia often states
the study is novel, immportant, aand thhat high fruuctose cornn syrup cauuses
interestingg. The edittor forwardds the obbesity, althhough theree is little coonvincing
commentss to the authors, alonng with a daata to suppport this claaim. Similarly, a
decision to accept thhe paper, to requestt reesearch repport might show that under
revision, oor to rejectt it. laaboratory cconditions, a new druug slows
thhe rate of ggrowth of ccultured cancer cells,
The role oof the revieewer is to eevaluate thhe buut the meddia may describe it ass a new
experimenntal designn and the ddata cuure for canncer.
presentedd, as well aas the interrpretation oof
the resultss. Sometimmes, the reeviewer will If you want tto know more about a news
find that thhe experimmental desiign was noot reeport on a scientific bbreakthrouggh, find
rigorous eenough to ssupport thee thhe original, peer-revieewed articlle and
interpretations madee by the auuthors, in reead what thhe researcchers actuaally
which ca
sse the revieewer mightt diiscovered.
recommend that addditional expperiments
Anatomy of a scientific paper
TITLE
AUTHOR INFORMATION
ABSTRACT: A summary of the study and findings,
written by the author.
INTRODUCTION: A statement of what is currently
known about the study subject that articulates the
questions being investigated. It cites other
scholarly works, lays the foundations for the study,
and sometimes states a hypothesis to be tested.
RESULTS: A description of the
research conducted and the results
obtained.
Results are presented as tables,
large datasets, and figures, which
Figure legend
can include graphs, videos,
diagrams, and photographs.
Some papers include additional
supporting data as a supplement.
DISCUSSION: An analysis and interpretation of the
data presented that integrates the new information
with prior findings, states the implications of the
work, and sometimes generates new hypotheses
tobe tested.
METHODS: A description of how the studies were
conducted, with sufficient detail so that others can
repeat them exactly.
REFERENCES: The list of the articles cited in
the paper that provide information on the research
topic and the methods used.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.