319x Filetype PDF File size 0.45 MB Source: eprints.umm.ac.id
17
CHAPTER III
RESERCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research Method
This research use quasi experimental design. Quasi experimental research is a
good design of the research because although it is not true experiments, it
provides reasonable controlled over most sources of invalidity and it is usually
stronger than the pre experimental design (McMillan and Schumacher, 2006).
Quasi experimental is a design where the researcher is able to control the
treatment but is not able to randomly assign the subject of the treatment (Ary,
2010).
Quasi experimental design focuses on treatment and outcome, hence the data
take from pre test and post test in order to know whether mind mapping can
improve english writing skill of descriptive text. In this research design, there are
two kinds of classes used. There are the experimental class were given treatment
by using mind mapping and controlled class by without mind mapping (Ary,
2010).
3.2 Hypotheses
This research has two hypotheses. The two hypotheses are null hypothesis
(H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1) that described as follows:
1) The null hypothesis (H0)
Mind mapping can not improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the
eight grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan.
2) The alternative hypothesis (H1)
Mind mapping can improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight
grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan
1.3 Population And Sample
Population in this research are second grade students of SMPN 6 Kota
Pasuruan. Population is the group of interest to researcher, the group to whom the
researcher would like to generalize the result of study (Sanjaya, 2013). The
17
18
population of this research is the second grade students of SMPN 6 Kota
Pasuruan. There are eight classes there (VIII-A, VIII-B, VIII-C, VIII-D, VIII-E,
VIII-F, VIII-G, VIII-H). The quantity of the students in second grade are 250
students.
Sample is portion of population (Azwar, 2010). the sample of this research
taken by two class from eight class that have the lower score of the middle test in
eight grade. The lower score of the middle test got by VIII-G (53) and VIII-H
(42). In addition, VIII-H become experimental class and VIII-G become control
class and VIII-G has 30 students and than VIII-H has 30 students. A tecnique of
sampling is purposive sampling. Purposive sampling is choosing the sampling
based on the certain puposes to support the research (Sukardi, 2003).
3.4 Data Collection
This research used student’s score of pre test and post test as the data. To
collect the data, the research needed an instrument and needed to do several
procedures.
3.5 Instruments And Data Gathering Technique
Instruments is a tools that is use to collect and analyze the data objectively
and systematic in order to solve a problem or testing a hypothesis (Sanjaya, 2013).
In this study the researcher use pre test and post test instrument. The test related to
descriptive text.
Data gathering technique is a systematic procedures and standards to obtain
the necessary data (Nasir, 2003). Data gathering technique in this study use
student’s writing score of pre test and post test. The resercher need an instrument
and need to do several procedures.
3.6 Data Analysis Technique
The gathered data use to find out the differences of students’achievement in
experimental class and controlled class. In line with this, the resercher uses
independent sampel t-test. It is use to examine the significance difference of
student’s writing skill of descriptive text achievement between experimental class
19
and controlled class. The researcher use SPSS 21 versions to ease calculation the
data. The formula of t-test as follow (Sudijono, 2006):
Notes:
M1 = Mean of Variable X (experimental class)
M2 = Mean of variable Y (controlled class)
SEM1 = Standard Error Mean of Variable X (experimental class)
SE = Standard Error Mean of variable Y (controlled class)
M2
To prove hypothesis, the data obtained in experimental class and control class
are calculated by using p-value. p-value is error value obtained from statistical
calculations with assumption as follows (Riduwan et al., 2011):
1) If p-value > error of degree (α) 0.05 the null hypothesis (H0) is accepted and
alternative hypothesis (H1) is rejected. It is proven that Mind mapping can
not improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of
SMPN 6 Pasuruan.
2) If p-value < error of degree (α) 0.05 the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and
alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted. It is proven that Mind mapping can
improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of SMPN 6
Pasuruan.
3.7 RESEARCH PROCEDURE
The data for this study is obtain from the student scores of writing pre test
and post test. To collect the data the procedure of research as follow:
1. Giving pre test
Pre test is delivere at the first time before the researcher apply the treatment
in experimental and control class.
2. Giving treatment
After pre test, the researcher give treatment to experimental class.
Experimental class were given treatment by using mind mapping and
20
controlled class by without mind mapping. The treatment for experimental
class were given only two meeting.
3. Giving post test
After the treatment, the researcher give a post test to experimental and control
class. By giving the post test, the researcher know whether the
implementation of mind mapping in writing descriptive text has a significant
role in increas students writing english skill or not. After that, the pre-test
and post test that produced will be scored by the researchers and classroom
teachers. It’s done in order to the value is given can be valid.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.