317x Filetype PPTX File size 0.20 MB Source: www.plymouth.ac.uk
Designing a Work Integrated Assessment Collaborate Project
The concept of a work‐integrated assessment is an assessment where the tasks and conditions are more
closely aligned to what you would experience within employment. Multiple Assessment Points Bringing together staff, students and employers to create
Move to a more distributed pattern of assessment; consider employability focused assessments enhanced by technology
introducing ‘surprise’ points
Module: Assessments are often delivered in the form of one summative
assessment, e.g. an exam or essay, at the end of a period of
Co-ordinator: formal learning. In employment however, ‘assessment’ or
evaluation points tend to occur frequently. In addition, timing is
often out of individual control, and consequently it can be
Year: necessary to juggle competing tasks at short notice.
Using multiple assessment points helps to develop reflective
thinking, whilst ‘surprise’ points support task prioritisation.
Peer / Self Review Time Varied Audiences
Include peer and/or self review explicitly in the assessment Aim to set explicit audiences for each assessment point
process In higher education the audience for an assessment is
Typically the review of assessments (i.e. feedback) in formal implicitly the academic that sets it, who will naturally be already
education is only provided by teaching staff. In employment, aligned in some way with the course and / or module. This
however, much of the review process comes in multiple forms, contrasts with employment, where the audience can be peers,
e.g. informal peer feedback from colleagues, formal and but is more often the client or another external third party, with
informal reviews from clients, and self-review of personal different values, priorities and expectations.
performance. Having to think for a different audience on an
Including peer and/or self review explicitly within an assessment provokes greater reflective thinking, and requires
assessment helps students to develop critical thinking skills, and Overview new types of synthesis.
encourages articulation and evidencing. Overview
This example shows a blank sheet, designed to be used by
This example shows a blank sheet, designed to be used by Audience
collaborative teams of staff, students and employers who have
collaborative teams of staff, students and employers who have
already expressed a desire to create a work‐integrated
already expressed a desire to create a work‐integrated
assessment. Six ‘dimensions’ are shown which are the hallmarks
assessment. Six ‘dimensions’ are shown which are the hallmarks
of o work-integrated assessment. The sheet is a thinking tool to
of o work-integrated assessment. The sheet is a thinking tool to
help the design team reflect on how a current assessment might
help the design team reflect on how a current assessment might
be marked on the six dimensions of the radar chart, and what
be marked on the six dimensions of the radar chart, and what
changes might be made to move along these six dimensions.
changes might be made to move along these six dimensions.
The model is designed to be used in three stages: (1) An analysis
The model is designed to be used in three stages: (1) An analysis
stage to understand how the assessments for a module
stage to understand how the assessments for a module
currently map to the dimensions, followed immediately by; (2) A
currently map to the dimensions, followed immediately by; (2) A
design stage where changes to the assessments are proposed Problem / Data
design stage where changes to the assessments are proposed
that will create movement along the dimensions, followed much
that will create movement along the dimensions, followed much
later by; (3) An evaluation stage after the assessments have run
later by; (3) An evaluation stage after the assessments have run
to assess the impact of designed changes.
to assess the impact of designed changes.
Light Structure ‘Real World’ Problem / Data
Lightly structure the overall assessment; reward student Set an overall real world problem, supported by real
approaches world data
Most thinking on assessment suggests that there should be Purely academic learning might require a theoretical problem in
explicit guidance to students concerning how and where marks order to test a theoretical understanding. In
are attained. However in employment part of the challenge for employment though problems tend to be very real, and the
the individual and/or team is the structuring of the work that Review Collaboration data that you need to work with rarely comes in coherent,
needs to be completed. Tasks need to be identified, processes standardised forms. It is usually in 'messier' formats that need
decided, and priorities allocated. to be interpreted to be of use.
Using a light structure approach encourages students to plan Using a real world problem and real world data helps to develop
tasks and goals in order to solve a bigger problem, Structure skills in analysis, interpretation and evaluation.
strengthening their project management and prioritisation Collaborative Working
skills. Create teams of students from the outset, encourage
collaboration
Many forms of assessment require working alone, yet
employment invariably requires some form of collaboration and
team work, and often with unknown and perhaps even
challenging individuals.
Encouraging students to work collaboratively and in teams
improves their ability to negotiate and discuss, and develops For more information contact Richard Osborne (r.m.osborne@exeter.ac.uk)
their understanding of team roles and role flexibility. Project blog available at http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/collaborate/
Designing a Work Integrated Assessment Collaborate Project
The concept of a work‐integrated assessment is an assessment where the tasks and conditions are more
closely aligned to what you would experience within employment. Multiple Assessment Points Bringing together staff, students and employers to create
Move to a more distributed pattern of assessment; consider employability focused assessments enhanced by technology
introducing ‘surprise’ points
Module: Assessments are often delivered in the form of one summative
Analysis Stage assessment, e.g. an exam or essay, at the end of a period of
Analysis Stage formal learning. In employment however, ‘assessment’ or
The analysis stage is an opportunity to think about how the assessments for
Co-ordinator:
The analysis stage is an opportunity to think about how the assessments for
evaluation points tend to occur frequently. In addition, timing is
the module under discussion currently map to the dimensions moofteden ol.u tI to fm inadyiv idual control, and consequently it can be
the module under discussion currently map to the dimensions model. It may
necessary to juggle competing tasks at short notice.
Year: well be the case that some aspects of the current assessments are already
well be the case that some aspects of the current assessments are already
Using multiple assessment points helps to develop reflective
well developed in terms of these dimensions. The purpose of the tool is to
well developed in terms of these dimensions. The purpose of the tool is to
thinking, whilst ‘surprise’ points support task prioritisation.
help the collaborative team visualise this, and highlight areas which aren’t Time
help the collaborative team visualise this, and highlight areas which aren’t
perhaps as well developed as others.
perhaps as well developed as others.
Peer / Self Review Varied Audiences
No explicit attempt has been made to quantify the scales of the axes. Teams
Include peer and/or self review explicitly in the assessment Aim to set explicit audiences for each assessment point
No explicit attempt has been made to quantify the scales of the axes. Teams
process are encouraged to use the boundaries implied by the top and bottom of the In higher education the audience for an assessment is
are encouraged to use the boundaries implied by the top and bottom of the
Typically the review of assessments (i.e. feedback) in formal implicitly the academic that sets it, who will naturally be already
scales, together with their interpretation of the best and worst aspects of
scales, together with their interpretation of the best and worst aspects of
education is only provided by teaching staff. In employment, aligned in some way with the course and / or module. This
their current assessments, as overall guides for rating within the model.
however, much of the review process comes in multiple forms, contrasts with employment, where the audience can be peers,
their current assessments, as overall guides for rating within the model.
e.g. informal peer feedback from colleagues, formal and but is more often the client or another external third party, with
informal reviews from clients, and self-review of personal different values, priorities and expectations.
performance. Review Audience Having to think for a different audience on an
Including peer and/or self review explicitly within an assessment provokes greater reflective thinking, and requires
assessment helps students to develop critical thinking skills, and new types of synthesis.
encourages articulation and evidencing.
Structure Problem / Data
Light Structure ‘Real World’ Problem / Data
Lightly structure the overall assessment; reward student Set an overall real world problem, supported by real
approaches world data
Most thinking on assessment suggests that there should be Purely academic learning might require a theoretical problem in
explicit guidance to students concerning how and where marks order to test a theoretical understanding. In
are attained. However in employment part of the challenge for employment though problems tend to be very real, and the
the individual and/or team is the structuring of the work that data that you need to work with rarely comes in coherent,
needs to be completed. Tasks need to be identified, processes standardised forms. It is usually in 'messier' formats that need
decided, and priorities allocated. to be interpreted to be of use.
Using a light structure approach encourages students to plan Using a real world problem and real world data helps to develop
tasks and goals in order to solve a bigger problem, Collaboration skills in analysis, interpretation and evaluation.
strengthening their project management and prioritisation Collaborative Working
skills. Create teams of students from the outset, encourage
collaboration
Many forms of assessment require working alone, yet
employment invariably requires some form of collaboration and
team work, and often with unknown and perhaps even
challenging individuals.
Evaluation Encouraging students to work collaboratively and in teams
improves their ability to negotiate and discuss, and develops For more information contact Richard Osborne (r.m.osborne@exeter.ac.uk)
their understanding of team roles and role flexibility. Project blog available at http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/collaborate/
Designing a Work Integrated Assessment Collaborate Project
The concept of a work‐integrated assessment is an assessment where the tasks and conditions are more
closely aligned to what you would experience within employment. Multiple Assessment Points Design Stage Bringing together staff, students and employers to create
Design Stage
Move to a more distributed pattern of assessment; consider employability focused assessments enhanced by technology
The design stage is where changes to the assessments are proposed that
introducing ‘surprise’ points The design stage is where changes to the assessments are proposed that
will create movement along the axes. The adding (or potentially
Assessments are often delivered in the form of one summative
Module: will create movement along the axes. The adding (or potentially
assessment, e.g. an exam or essay, at the end of a period of
removing) of components is discussed that will help to create
removing) of components is discussed that will help to create
formal learning. In employment however, ‘assessment’ or
movement along the axes as appropriate.
Co-ordinator: movement along the axes as appropriate.
evaluation points tend to occur frequently. In addition, timing is
often out of individual control, and consequently it can be
necessary to juggle competing tasks at short notice.
Technology “Top Trumps” have been designed to be used in conjunction
Year: Technology “Top Trumps” have been designed to be used in conjunction
Using multiple assessment points helps to develop reflective
with this model, which suggest digital technologies that could support
with this model, which suggest digital technologies that could support
thinking, whilst ‘surprise’ points support task prioritisation.
Time the proposed changes. Examples might be a wiki to o support the
the proposed changes. Examples might be a wiki to o support the
Collaboration dimension, a project management tool to support the
Collaboration dimension, a project management tool to support the
Structure dimension, or perhaps a blog to support the Time dimension.
Structure dimension, or perhaps a blog to support the Time dimension.
Peer / Self Review Varied Audiences
Include peer and/or self review explicitly in the assessment Aim to set explicit audiences for each assessment point
process In higher education the audience for an assessment is
Typically the review of assessments (i.e. feedback) in formal implicitly the academic that sets it, who will naturally be already
education is only provided by teaching staff. In employment, aligned in some way with the course and / or module. This
however, much of the review process comes in multiple forms, contrasts with employment, where the audience can be peers,
e.g. informal peer feedback from colleagues, formal and but is more often the client or another external third party, with
informal reviews from clients, and self-review of personal different values, priorities and expectations.
performance. Review Audience Having to think for a different audience on an
Including peer and/or self review explicitly within an assessment provokes greater reflective thinking, and requires
assessment helps students to develop critical thinking skills, and new types of synthesis.
encourages articulation and evidencing.
Structure Problem / Data
Light Structure ‘Real World’ Problem / Data
Lightly structure the overall assessment; reward student Set an overall real world problem, supported by real
approaches world data
Most thinking on assessment suggests that there should be Purely academic learning might require a theoretical problem in
explicit guidance to students concerning how and where marks order to test a theoretical understanding. In
are attained. However in employment part of the challenge for employment though problems tend to be very real, and the
the individual and/or team is the structuring of the work that data that you need to work with rarely comes in coherent,
needs to be completed. Tasks need to be identified, processes standardised forms. It is usually in 'messier' formats that need
decided, and priorities allocated. to be interpreted to be of use.
Using a light structure approach encourages students to plan Using a real world problem and real world data helps to develop
tasks and goals in order to solve a bigger problem, Collaboration skills in analysis, interpretation and evaluation.
strengthening their project management and prioritisation Collaborative Working
skills. Create teams of students from the outset, encourage
collaboration
Many forms of assessment require working alone, yet
employment invariably requires some form of collaboration and
team work, and often with unknown and perhaps even
challenging individuals.
Analysis Evaluation Encouraging students to work collaboratively and in teams
improves their ability to negotiate and discuss, and develops For more information contact Richard Osborne (r.m.osborne@exeter.ac.uk)
their understanding of team roles and role flexibility. Project blog available at http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/collaborate/
Designing a Work Integrated Assessment Collaborate Project
The concept of a work‐integrated assessment is an assessment where the tasks and conditions are more
closely aligned to what you would experience within employment.. Multiple Assessment Points Bringing together staff, students and employers to create
Move to a more distributed pattern of assessment; consider employability focused assessments enhanced by technology
introducing ‘surprise’ points
Module: Assessments are often delivered in the form of one summative
assessment, e.g. an exam or essay, at the end of a period of
Co-ordinator: formal learning. In employment however, ‘assessment’ or
evaluation points tend to occur frequently. In addition, timing is
often out of individual control, and consequently it can be
Year: necessary to juggle competing tasks at short notice.
Using multiple assessment points helps to develop reflective
thinking, whilst ‘surprise’ points support task prioritisation.
Time
Peer / Self Review Varied Audiences
Include peer and/or self review explicitly in the assessment Aim to set explicit audiences for each assessment point
process In higher education the audience for an assessment is
Typically the review of assessments (i.e. feedback) in formal implicitly the academic that sets it, who will naturally be already
Evaluation Stage
Evaluation Stage
education is only provided by teaching staff. In employment, aligned in some way with the course and / or module. This
The final stage using the dimensions model is
however, much of the review process comes in multiple forms, contrasts with employment, where the audience can be peers,
The final stage using the dimensions model is
e.g. informal peer feedback from colleagues, formal and but is more often the client or another external third party, with
an evaluation stage after the assessments have
an evaluation stage after the assessments have
informal reviews from clients, and self-review of personal different values, priorities and expectations.
run, which will evaluate the overall impact of
run, which will evaluate the overall impact of
performance. Having to think for a different audience on an
the designed changes. Review Audience
Including peer and/or self review explicitly within an assessment provokes greater reflective thinking, and requires
the designed changes.
assessment helps students to develop critical thinking skills, and new types of synthesis.
encourages articulation and evidencing.
A separate evaluation tool has been designed
A separate evaluation tool has been designed
for use with the model, which creates a third
for use with the model, which creates a third
polygon to illustrate visually how those
polygon to illustrate visually how those
involved with the assessment think they have
involved with the assessment think they have
developed in terms of the six dimensions. The
developed in terms of the six dimensions. The
dimensions themselves are not directly
dimensions themselves are not directly
referenced, instead 48 skill cards are rated by
referenced, instead 48 skill cards are rated by
participants on a 7-stage Likert type scale. The
participants on a 7-stage Likert type scale. The
cards are pre-coded with one of the six
cards are pre-coded with one of the six
dimensions, and hence a score for each
dimensions, and hence a score for each
dimension can be extracted from the data by
dimension can be extracted from the data by
the evaluators, and applied to the model.
the evaluators, and applied to the model.
Structure Problem / Data
Light Structure ‘Real World’ Problem / Data
Lightly structure the overall assessment; reward student Set an overall real world problem, supported by real
approaches world data
Most thinking on assessment suggests that there should be Purely academic learning might require a theoretical problem in
explicit guidance to students concerning how and where marks order to test a theoretical understanding. In
are attained. However in employment part of the challenge for employment though problems tend to be very real, and the
the individual and/or team is the structuring of the work that data that you need to work with rarely comes in coherent,
needs to be completed. Tasks need to be identified, processes standardised forms. It is usually in 'messier' formats that need
decided, and priorities allocated. to be interpreted to be of use.
Using a light structure approach encourages students to plan Using a real world problem and real world data helps to develop
tasks and goals in order to solve a bigger problem, Collaboration skills in analysis, interpretation and evaluation.
strengthening their project management and prioritisation Collaborative Working
skills. Create teams of students from the outset, encourage
collaboration
Many forms of assessment require working alone, yet
employment invariably requires some form of collaboration and
team work, and often with unknown and perhaps even
challenging individuals.
Analysis Design Encouraging students to work collaboratively and in teams
improves their ability to negotiate and discuss, and develops For more information contact Richard Osborne (r.m.osborne@exeter.ac.uk)
their understanding of team roles and role flexibility. Project blog available at http://blogs.exeter.ac.uk/collaborate/
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.