319x Filetype PPTX File size 0.10 MB Source: files.consumerfinance.gov
Disclaimer
This presentation is being made by Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau representatives on behalf
of the Bureau. It does not constitute legal
interpretation, guidance, or advice of the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau.
This document was used in support of a live
discussion. As such, it does not necessarily express
the entirety of that discussion nor the relative
emphasis of topics therein.
2
Dodd-Frank Act
▪ In substantive rulemakings, Section 1022(b) of the Dodd-
Frank Act requires the CFPB to consider:
◻ The potential benefits and costs to consumers and
covered persons;
◻ The potential reduction of access by consumers to
consumer financial products or services;
◻ The impact on consumers in rural areas;
◻ The impact on insured depository institutions or
credit unions with total assets of $10 billion or less.
3
Dodd-Frank Act (continued)
▪ Section 1022(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the CFPB
to conduct an assessment of each significant rule or
order adopted by the Bureau under Federal consumer
financial law.
◻ The Bureau must publish a report of the assessment not later than
five years after the effective date of such rule or order.
◻ The assessment must address, among other relevant factors, the
rule or order's effectiveness in meeting the purposes and objectives
of title X of the Dodd-Frank Act and the specific goals stated by the
Bureau.
◻ The assessment must reflect available evidence and any data that
the Bureau reasonably may collect. Before publishing a report of
its assessment, the Bureau must invite public comment on
recommendations for modifying, expanding, or eliminating the rule
or order. 4
Bureau Practice
▪ The Bureau established practices in early 2012 to meet
the Section 1022(b) cost-benefit requirement in Dodd-
Frank.
These practices include:
▪ Staffing teams in substantive rulemakings with
economists and market experts as well as attorneys and
integrating the consideration of benefits, costs and
impacts into the rulemaking process;
▪ Making the Office of Research accountable for the
analyses required by Section 1022(b);
5
Bureau Practice (continued)
▪ Publishing with proposed and final substantive rules a
Section 1022(b) analysis that reviews significant
regulatory requirements for the expected benefits, costs
and impacts specified in that section and which meets
general standards for cost-benefit analysis, such as:
◻ Using an explicit baseline consistently throughout the
analysis,
◻ Considering the effects of significant alternatives to the
rule,
◻ Quantifying and monetizing the costs and benefits where
appropriate and reasonably feasible to do so (possibly using
6
estimates, ranges or outer boundaries), and explaining why
potentially significant benefits or costs cannot be quantified
or monetized.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.