327x Filetype PPT File size 2.81 MB Source: personal.strath.ac.uk
Cost-benefit analysis
Cost-benefit analysis, CBA, is the social appraisal of marginal
investment projects, and policies, which have consequences over time
It uses criteria derived from welfare economics, rather than commercial
criteria.
CBA seeks to correct project appraisal for market failure
Environmental impacts of projects/policies are frequently externalities,
both negative and positive
CBA seeks to attach monetary values to external effects so that they can be
taken account of along with the effects on ordinary inputs and outputs to
the project/policy
CBA is the same as BCA – Benefit-cost analysis.
Intertemporal efficiency
Given that CBA is concerned with consequences over time, and based in welfare
economics, a key idea is that of intertemporal efficiency.
UA UA(CA,CA)
0 1 (11.1)
UB UB(CB,CB)
0 1
An allocation is efficient if it is impossible to make one individual better
off without thereby making the other worse off.
Intertemporal efficiency requires the satisfaction of 3 conditions
Equality of individuals’ consumption discount rates
Equality of rates of return to investment across firms
Equality of the common consumption discount rate with the common
rate of return
Discount rate equality
MRUS A MRUS B otherwise one could be made better off without making the other
C0,c1 = C0,c1
worse off
A
r MRUSA 1 defines A’s consumption discount rate
C0,C1 ≡ C0,C1
Then the first intertemporal efficiency condition is stated as
A B
r =r = r (11.2)
Note: consumption discount rates are not constants.
Shifting consumption over time
Foregoing Cb Ca makes Ca Cb available next
0 0 1 1
period. The rate of return to, on,investment is
defined as C I
1 0
I0
where ΔC1 is the second period
increase in consumption, Ca Cb ,
1 1
resulting from the first period
increase in investment ΔI , Cb Ca .
0 0 0
For ΔI0 = ΔC0, this is
ΔC ( ΔC ) ΔC ΔC ΔC
δ 1 0 1 0 1 1
ΔC ΔC ΔC
0 0 0
which is the negative of the slope of the transformation frontier minus 1, which can
be written
1 s
where s is the slope of the frontier.
Rate of return equality
If each firm were investing as indicated by C 1b and C 2b, then period 1
0 0
consumption could be increased, without loss of period 0 consumption, by
having firm 1, where the rate of return is higher, increase investment by the
amount firm 2, where the rate of return is lower, reduced its investment.
Only where rates of return are equal is this kind of period 1 gain
impossible. For N firms, the second intertemporal efficiency condition is
,i1,...,N (11.3)
i
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.