297x Filetype PPT File size 0.21 MB Source: www.seas.upenn.edu
Background:
• Initial suture testing proved inconclusive due to small sample
size and inaccurate testing procedures
•
Larger sample size and the use of Instron technology will allow
for investigation and comparison of the material properties of two
suture techniques
Hypothesis & Objectives:
Based on raw data collected in past
experiments, it is hypothesized that the
horizontal mattress suture technique will
have a greater failure strength and higher
Young’s Modulus than the vertical mattress
suture technique.
Department of Bioengineering Julianne Huegel
Methods & Protocol:
•
Sample size is ten successful sample failures for each suture technique.
•
Measure and cut 20 samples of the CottonDuck canvas material with
dimensions of 7.5 cm by 2.4 cm. Cut each of these in half crosswise.
•
Create two groups of 10 “wound” samples and sew 4 stitches into each
sample, with one population receiving horizontal mattress stitches and
one population receiving vertical mattress stitches. Each stitch should be
of uniform length, spacing, and distance from the edges of the sample to
be determined as appropriate by the group.
•
Insert each sample into the clamps, run Instron. Collect Stress-Strain
curve data. Use a speed previously determined to be appropriate by
using other materials. A speed of 60 mm/min is recommended. Use tape
to minimize slippage if necessary.
•
Save data for further analysis.
Department of Bioengineering Leia Harbour
Proposed Findings:
The two populations, vertical and horizontal
mattress suture samples, will provide
ten trials each. Each trial will produce a: A sample Stress-Strain curve:
1. Stress vs. Strain Curve
2. Young’s Modulus
3. Failure Strength
4. Descriptive statistics and t-tests will be
used to analyze Items 2 and 3 to
investigate possible statistically
significant differences between the
techniques. In accordance with the
hypothesis, it is expected that vertical
mattress sutures will have a lower
Young’s modulus and a lower failure
strength based on our pilot data.
http://nsmwww.eng.ohio-state.edu/Stamping_Glossary/assets/images/autogen/a_y3.gif
Department of Bioengineering Chia-Heng Wu
Potential Pitfalls:
•
Inability of clamps to secure the sutured material in a fixed
position resulting in slippage.
•
Experimenter’s inability to have a constant suturing technique
which could result in unequally spaced stitches.
•
Some sutures may be tighter than others within a test sample.
•
May experience failure in the material prior to failure of the
sutures.
Department of Bioengineering William Okech
Equipment, Materials and Budget
Materials to be Purchased: •
The Instron will be utilized to
Individual Price test for the desired material
properties.
Straight Roundpoint $15.56 •
Needle (4 in. x 12) Needles and polyester thread
are necessary for suturing two
Polyester Thread (diam. $5.16 pieces of canvas together.
0.023 in x 206 yds w/ 21 •
lb. tensile strength) Polyethylene tape will be
provided for preventing slippage.
CottonDuck Canvas $2.08/ft *15 ft =
Fabric (0.04 in. thick x $31.2 •
Heavyweight canvas is used in
36 in. wide) order to limit material
Polyethylene Tape (1/32 $20.13 deformation to the suture only.
in. thick x 72 yds) •
To ensure suture failure,
TOTAL PRICE (all mat’ls $72.05 polyester thread was chosen
supplied by McMaster- because it’s tensile strength is
Carr) less than that of other suture
materials.
Department of Bioengineering Group 102B3
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.