Filetype PDF | Posted on 30 Sep 2022 | 4 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
297x Filetype PDF File size 0.10 MB Source: coping.us
BRIEF REPORT
Cognitive-Behavioral Group Treatment for Panic
Disorder With Agoraphobia
Ferdinando Galassi, Silvia Quercioli, Diana Charismas,
Valentina Niccolai, and Elisabetta Barciulli
University of Florence
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is well documented in the treatment of
panic disorder with or without agoraphobia; however, little is known about
the efficacy of group treatment. The purpose of this open study is to
investigate the benefits of a combination of the major cognitive and behav-
ioral techniques used in the several specific versions of CBT thus far devel-
oped, in a psychotherapeutic group approach for panic and agoraphobia.
Seventy-six outpatients meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders, third edition, revised (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric
Association, 1987) criteria for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia
were included in the study. The treatment consisted of 14 weekly 2-hr
groupsessions and included: (a) an educational component, (b) interocep-
tive exposure, (c) cognitive restructuring, (d) problem solving, and (e) in
vivo exposure. Patients achieved significant treatment gains on all dimen-
sions assessed with a high rate of panic remission and significant im-
provement in the associated symptoms. Furthermore, these gains were
maintained at 6-months follow-up. Our results suggest the feasibility of
this combination of cognitive and behavioral techniques. The findings raise
questions about the specificity and the impact of each technique. © 2007
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol 63: 409–416, 2007.
Keywords: panic; cognitive-behavioral therapy
Panic disorder (PD) is the most common anxiety disorder, affecting from 2 to 6% of the
generalpopulation(Kessleretal.,1994).Althoughpharmacologicaltreatmentshaveproved
helpful for many panic sufferers, there are problems associated with their use: fear of
taking medications, noncompliance, troublesome side effects, high attrition rates, and
relapse upon withdrawal of medication.
Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to: Valentina Niccolai, via G. Bruno 10, 51100 Pistoia,
Italy; e-mail: galassi@unifi.it
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 63(4), 409–416 (2007) ©2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20358
410 Journal of Clinical Psychology, April 2007
Several controlled trials showing the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
for panic disorder with agoraphobia (Craske, Brown, & Barlow, 1991; Margraf, Barlow,
Clark, & Telch, 1993; Ost, Westling, & Hellstrom, 1993; Telch et al., 1993) have led to
the establishment of the CBT efficacy for PD by the National Institute of Mental Health
(1991).TherationaleisthatpatientsmeetingdiagnosticcriteriaforPDhaveaheightened
tendency to react with fear to ordinary bodily sensations. The CBT model is theoretically
promising, as it should act to break the link between bodily sensations and fear (Schmidt,
Lerew, & Trakowski, 1997). Several specific versions of CBT for panic disorder have
been developed, each consisting of a combination of the following major strategies with
specific aims: (a) Cognitive restructuring focuses on correcting misappraisal of bodily
sensations as dangerous events, (b) in vivo exposure to the feared situations or stimuli
aimstodisconfirmthelearned experience and the relative mental automatism (Jacobson,
Wilson,&Tupper,1988)andhelpsindividualsovercomeagoraphobicavoidance(Marks,
1987), and (c) between-session homework encourages patients to verify results outside
the ambulatory, to assume a positive attitude, and by modifying their thought patterns, to
gain more control of the problem. This usually results in a feeling of personal growth and
recovery from illness. In the treatment of anxiety disorders, most studies have focused on
one or two of these strategies for treatment and on an individual basis whereas few
studies have presented a group treatment (Belfer, Munoz, Schachter, & Levendusky,
1995; Martinsen, Olsen, Tonset, Nyland, &Aarre, 1998; Penava, Otto, Maki, & Pollack,
1998; Telch et al., 1993).
In the present study, we describe a group-setting treatment for PD with agoraphobia
focused on reducing both agoraphobic avoidance and frequency of panic attacks where
the major treatment components/factors refer to the approach of Barlow, Craske, Cerny,
and Klosko (1989) and partly to Beck and Emery’s (1985) and Clark’s (1986) theories.
The aim of this study was to (a) assess the outcome of a broad cognitive-behavioral
approach to PD and (b) assess the stability of participants’progress after 6 months from
the end of treatment.
Method
Participants
Seventy-six patients from an annual list supplied by the Italian League for Panic Attack
Disorder, meeting criteria described later and voluntarily referring to the Psychiatric
ClinicOutpatientService,wereenrolledinthisstudyfrom1995to2001.Onafirst-come,
first-served basis, patients’diagnoses were established using the Structured Clinical Inter-
view (Spitzer, Williams, Gibbon, & First, 1990) for the Diagnostic and Statistical Man-
ual of Mental Disorders, third edition, revised (DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric
Association, 1987). Participants were recruited for the study if they fulfilled the follow-
ing criteria: having a DSM-III-R diagnosis of panic disorder with agoraphobia, having
had at least one panic attack during the past 30 days, no recent change in psychotropic
medications, no history of psychosis, bipolar disorder, or substance-abuse disorder, and
no experience of psychotherapy. All patients signed a written informed consent. Age of
completers ranged from 22 to 57 years (M 37.63 6 8.9). Demographic characteristics
are presented in Table 1. Mean duration of panic disorder was 10.9667.83 years; 17.1%
of patients were not under pharmacological treatment whereas 82.9% had been under
stable psychotropic treatment for almost 2 months. Of the 76 patients who began the
treatment program, 59 completed it and were included in the data analysis. A total of 17
peopledroppedoutofthestudy:Sixdroppedoutafterthefirstsessionforreasonsrelated
Journal of Clinical Psychology DOI 10.1002/jclp
CBTforPanic Disorder With Agoraphobia 411
Table 1
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Patients
(N76)
Characteristic Value
Age (in years) (mean 6 SD) 37.6368.9
Females/males, n 60/16
Marital Status
Married 64.4
Divorced 6.6
Single 29.0
Occupation (%)
Employee 42.1
Student 9.2
Unemployed 9.2
Housewife 10.5
Worker 9.2
Trader 7.9
Professional 9.2
Pensioner 2.6
to the treatment, and 4 dropped out for reasons unrelated to the treatment and due to the
onset of life events precluding continuation of the treatment. Seven participants attended
at least seven sessions; since they made good improvement, they decided to stop the
treatment, and thus their posttreatment measures were not recorded.
Treatment
Patients were treated in groups, each comprising from 10 to 12 patients, to permit all
participants to properly address their interpersonal issues. The six groups came to the
Center of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy at the Psychiatric Clinic of the University of
Florence for 14 weekly meetings, each lasting 2 hr. Each session was conducted by two
psychiatrists, one experienced in CBTandonetrainer.Patientswereprovidedwithdetailed
guidelines and checklists concerning the techniques applied in each session of the treat-
ment. The first session was devoted to functional analysis of the relationship between
emotions, behavior, and cognition. Patients were educated both orally and by written
information about the nature and physiology of anxiety and panic attacks with agorapho-
bia, and about the onset of the disorder according to a cognitive-behavioral approach.
Participants also were given information on psychotherapies and drugs for panic therapy.
Cognitive and behavioral techniques were implemented from Sessions 2 to 14. The cog-
nitive component included cognitive restructuring, assertive training, and problem solv-
ing; the behavioral part consisted of gradual exposure tasks chosen by both the therapist
andthepatients,referring to the behavioral test form.The in-session exercises, the home-
work, and the cognitive techniques were presented and discussed to facilitate subsequent
exposure and compliance.
Assessment
Pretreatment and posttreatment interviews were conducted by an independent evaluator.
AcomprehensivebatteryassessingmajorclinicaldimensionsofPD(panicattacks,anxiety,
Journal of Clinical Psychology DOI 10.1002/jclp
412 Journal of Clinical Psychology, April 2007
phobic avoidance, depression, impairment in psychosocial functioning) was adminis-
tered at baseline, posttreatment, and at 6-months’ follow-up. Assessments took place 2
weeks before the first session, 2 weeks after the last session, and 6 months later. Symp-
toms were assessed as follows: Demographic information, frequency of panic attacks
during the last month, fear of experiencing further attacks (rated 1–10 according to its
severity), behavioral avoidanceofsituations,physicalsymptomsexperiencedduringpanic
attacks, and current medication status were assessed by demographic and clinical sched-
ules created for that purpose by the staff of the Department for Panic Disorder. Degree of
phobic avoidance was assessed by the two subscales of Mobility Inventory for Agora-
phobia (MIA; Chambless, Caputo, & Jasin, 1984); generalized anxiety was self-rated by
the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI; Spielberg, Gorsuch, & Lushene, 1970), the
STAI-State (STAI-S), which provides an index of how anxious the subject feels at the
time of assessment, and the STAI-Trait (STAI-T), which rates the general anxiety level.
Disability across the domains of work, social, and family life was evaluated by the Shee-
han Disability Scale (Sheehan, Harnett-Sheehan, & Raj, 1996). Level of depression was
assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, &
Erbaugh,1961),andthePatient’sGlobalImpression(PGI)andtheClinicalGlobalImpres-
sion (CGI) scales report the degree of improvement perceived by the patient and the
clinician, respectively (Guy, 1976).
Statistics
Within-group changes in scores on the rating scales between pretreatment and posttreat-
ment and between posttreatment and follow-up were analyzed using paired t test. Chi-
square test was used to analyze frequency distributions. A significant level of 0.05 (two-
tailed) was used. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Version 6.0.
Results
The t-test analysis showed the effectiveness of CBT, as demonstrated by a significant
reduction in scores on the rating scales. There was a significant decrease of participants’
score means in all scales from the beginning to the end of the treatment; gains also were
maintained at the follow-up after 6 months (see Table 2). All scales showed the same
trend, and the largest score reductions were on the STAI, the MIA, and the BDI scales.
After an accurate exam of each case, most of the treated patients showed clinically
significant improvement on phobic avoidance, depression, and disability indexes.Antici-
patory anxiety also showed a reduction from a mean of 6.97 6 2.18 at the pretreatment
assessment to 4.88 6 2.68 at the posttreatment assessment. The difference was tested
using a paired t test and was shown to be significant, t(58) 5.17, p .05.
Asfor panic-attack frequency, data showed a pretreatment mean of 3.1264.00 and
a posttreatment mean of 1.1562.06; the difference was statistically significant, t(58)
4.12, p .05. Fifty-four percent of the treated patients achieved panic-free status after
treatment, 6.7% achieved a reduction of 80 to 90% of panic attacks, 8.5% showed a
reduction of 50%, and 10% showed a reduction of 20 to 25%; 20.3% of the participants
did not show any reduction of panic-attack frequency. On the PGI scale, 53.4% of the
patients reported as “much improved” after treatment whereas only 6.9% of the patients
reported as “not improved.”
Chi-square analysis revealed significant differences in neurological, cardiac, respi-
ratory, and psychological symptoms frequency reported in the first two assessments (see
Table 3).
Journal of Clinical Psychology DOI 10.1002/jclp
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
