343x Filetype PDF File size 1.27 MB Source: www2.deloitte.com
The ‘DNA’ of
leadership
potential
Human Capital Consulting | Deloitte Leadership UK
© 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved.
The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential
Deloitte Leadership Capability Model: Theory
The aim of this document is to provide an It was David McClelland (1975) who first publicised
Deloitte Leadership has account of the development of the Deloitte the term ‘competency’, and the concept was
developed a leadership Leadership model, based on psychological popularised further by Richard Boyatzis (1982) in
model which identifies the theory and studies, leadership literature, and his seminal book ‘The Competent Manager: A
empirical research. Model for Effective Performance’. There are many
reasons for the popularity of competency models.
‘building blocks’ or ‘DNA’ of
potential for senior Background
managers. The ‘Leadership At the heart of any leadership talent They provide a common language about what is
management system is a model of capability. expected of people, a foundation for
Since the 1970s, behavioural competencies performance management discussions,
Capability Model’ forms the
have been used by organisations to capture the transparency about what matters for promotion
basis of Deloitte’s criteria associated with successful leadership. It and a ‘syllabus’ for management development.
processes for assessing the is estimated that 80% of organisations apply the However, despite their success in other areas
capability and potential of approach (CIPD, 2007). difficulties arise when competencies are used as
individual leaders. the basis for forming judgements about leaders’
potential.
© 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 2
The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential
Assessing potential
In the assessment of leaders’ potential, Another criticism levied towards For example, below are real examples of
competencies can be criticised because they competencies is that of complexity. If you competency descriptions. The different
focus heavily upon past behaviour rather than analyse most competency descriptions, you colours represent discrete
future potential. The mantra behind will find that each competency is in fact an psychological skills.
competency-based assessment is ‘the best amalgamation of a variety of different areas of
predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour’ knowledge, skills and motivation.
(Smith, 1989). Consequently, competency-based
“Is clear and consistent in decision making,
interviews are inherently retrospective; “tell me “ ..it often emerges that competencies do not takes actions andinspires trust in others”
about a time you…”. Therefore whether a leader make psychological sense. Either the
has sufficient ‘relevant’ experience will be a psychological qualities required for different “Takes responsibility within the group,
keeps the group working together by
significant factor in determining their behaviours described under a single adjusting own interventions, supports and
competence rating. Furthermore, if an individual competency conflict with each other, or the challenges others”
has not demonstrated a competency in the same thing is true across two (or more)
past, what can we conclude about their different competencies - implying that it is “Uses a combination of logical argument,
personal conviction and passion to create a
potential to develop and display that unlikely that an individual could score highly winning case”
competency in the future? on both”. Clive Fletcher (1996)
© 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 3
The ‘DNA’ of leadership potential
Assessing potential
As Fletcher (1996) states: “the same Consequently, the strength of competencies in
psychological factors contribute to different guiding performance management by
competencies. A common example would be describing clearly observable behaviours is also
‘emotional control’. This contributes to the their weakness in assessment; they are typically
assessment of competencies such as ‘customer a mix of psychological factors which do not
relations’, ‘resilience’ and ‘interpersonal co-vary and differ in their ability to be
sensitivity’”. developed.
The reason for this is that competencies are
descriptions of behaviour, not psychological
skills. They are the manifestation of the
interaction of a variety of psychological
processes, such as thinking, memory and
emotions. Indeed, Boyatzis’ definition of a
competency is: “a motive, trait, skills, aspect of
one’s self-image or social role, or a body of
knowledge which he or she uses.”
Boyatzis (1982)
© 2020 Deloitte MCS Limited. All rights reserved. 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.